Preparing Mobile Home HVAC Units for Intense Summer Heat

Preparing Mobile Home HVAC Units for Intense Summer Heat

Importance of Efficient Duct Layouts for Airflow

As summer approaches, the mercury rises, and with it, the challenge of keeping our living spaces comfortable becomes paramount. For those residing in mobile homes, this task can be particularly daunting due to the specific nature of their HVAC systems and construction materials. Preparing mobile home HVAC units for intense summer heat is not just a matter of comfort-it is an essential step in ensuring safety and energy efficiency.


Energy-efficient HVAC units can significantly reduce utility costs in mobile homes mobile home hvac repair manufactured housing.

Mobile homes are unique in their design and construction, often leading to different thermal dynamics compared to traditional houses. These structures tend to have less insulation, making them susceptible to rapid temperature changes. Therefore, when summer heatwaves hit, these homes can quickly become unbearably hot if not properly managed. Ensuring your HVAC system is up to the task begins with a thorough assessment before the heat arrives.


Maintenance plays a crucial role in preparing your mobile home's HVAC unit for summer's intense heat. Regularly servicing your unit will not only extend its lifespan but also improve its efficiency. Start by scheduling a professional inspection to identify any issues that might impede performance. This includes checking refrigerant levels, inspecting ducts for leaks or blockages, and cleaning or replacing filters. A well-maintained system will operate more effectively, providing consistent cooling without overworking itself.


Another critical aspect of preparation involves enhancing your mobile home's overall energy efficiency. Simple actions such as sealing windows and doors can prevent cool air from escaping and hot air from entering. Installing reflective window films or using thermal curtains can significantly reduce heat gain through windows. Additionally, consider adding awnings or shades on sun-exposed sides of your home to further minimize direct sunlight impact.


Upgrading your thermostat is another strategy worth considering. Smart thermostats offer precision control over temperature settings and allow you to program cooling schedules that align with your daily routine-optimizing energy use while maintaining comfort levels when you're at home.


It's also essential to stay informed about weather forecasts and prepare for potential power outages during peak usage times-a common issue during extreme heat periods. Keeping portable fans handy and having an emergency plan can ensure you remain comfortable even if the HVAC system temporarily goes offline.


Finally, educating everyone in the household about efficient cooling practices can contribute significantly to managing indoor temperatures effectively. Encourage family members or roommates to keep windows closed during the hottest parts of the day and utilize ceiling fans as complementary cooling devices rather than relying solely on air conditioning.


In conclusion, preparing mobile home HVAC units for intense summer heat requires proactive maintenance combined with strategic upgrades aimed at improving both system performance and overall home energy efficiency. By taking these measures seriously before high temperatures strike, residents can enjoy a cool refuge from the sweltering outside world-ensuring safety and comfort throughout the season's most challenging days.

As the summer months approach, homeowners begin to prepare for the inevitable rise in temperatures. For those residing in mobile homes, ensuring that your HVAC unit is ready to handle the intense summer heat is not just a matter of comfort but also of safety and efficiency. Evaluating the current condition of your HVAC unit becomes an essential task in this preparation process. By taking proactive steps now, you can avoid potential breakdowns during peak heat and ensure your home remains a cool haven throughout the season.


The first step in evaluating your HVAC unit involves a thorough inspection. Begin by checking both indoor and outdoor components for any visible signs of wear or damage. Look for cracks or leaks in ductwork, which can significantly reduce efficiency by allowing cool air to escape before it reaches your living space. Additionally, inspect the fins and coils on the outdoor unit for dirt or debris buildup, as these can obstruct airflow and force your system to work harder than necessary.


Next, consider the age and performance history of your HVAC system. Most units have a lifespan of 10 to 15 years; if yours is approaching this age range or has required frequent repairs recently, it might be time to consider an upgrade. Newer models are typically more energy-efficient and equipped with advanced features that enhance performance while reducing energy consumption.


Routine maintenance plays a pivotal role in keeping your HVAC unit functioning optimally. Replace air filters every one to three months, depending on usage and manufacturer's recommendations. Clean filters improve airflow and air quality while also preventing strain on the system's components. Additionally, scheduling a professional tune-up before summer hits is advisable; an experienced technician can perform tasks such as checking refrigerant levels, tightening electrical connections, and lubricating moving parts.


Another critical aspect of preparing for summer is evaluating thermostat settings and functionality. Programmable thermostats enable you to set different temperatures for various times of day, optimizing comfort while minimizing energy use when cooling isn't needed as much-like during nighttime hours or when you're away from home.


Finally, don't overlook insulation within your mobile home itself; this plays a crucial role in maintaining interior temperatures regardless of outside conditions. Ensure windows are properly sealed against drafts and consider adding curtains or blinds that block direct sunlight during peak hours.


In conclusion, preparing your mobile home's HVAC unit for intense summer heat requires attention to detail across several fronts-from inspecting physical components to upgrading outdated technology-all aimed at maximizing efficiency and reliability under pressure conditions typical during hot weather spells ahead! Taking these steps not only safeguards against unexpected failures but also contributes towards sustainable living practices by conserving energy resources effectively throughout seasonal changes encountered annually alike!

More About Us

What Yelp Says About Us

How to reach us


Best Practices for Managing Indoor Air Quality in Mobile Homes During Winter

Best Practices for Managing Indoor Air Quality in Mobile Homes During Winter

As winter descends, residents of mobile homes face the dual challenge of maintaining warmth and ensuring good indoor air quality.. The importance of implementing energy-efficient solutions without compromising air quality becomes paramount during this season.

Posted by on 2024-12-30

The Role of Duct Sealing in Maintaining Airflow in Mobile Home HVAC Systems

The Role of Duct Sealing in Maintaining Airflow in Mobile Home HVAC Systems

Duct sealing plays a critical role in maintaining optimal airflow within mobile home HVAC systems, ensuring energy efficiency, comfort, and air quality.. Mobile homes often face unique challenges due to their construction and the frequent movement of HVAC components during transportation.

Posted by on 2024-12-30

Adapting Mobile Home HVAC Systems to Regional Air Quality Challenges

Adapting Mobile Home HVAC Systems to Regional Air Quality Challenges

Adapting mobile home HVAC systems to regional air quality challenges is a subject of growing importance, as environmental concerns and health implications take center stage.. One of the most effective approaches to addressing these issues is through a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of upgrading mobile home HVAC systems to improve air quality.

Posted by on 2024-12-30

Techniques for Mapping Duct Layouts

As the sweltering days of summer approach, ensuring that your mobile home's HVAC system is prepared to combat the heat becomes a matter of comfort and necessity. One crucial aspect of this preparation involves cleaning and maintaining air filters and ducts. This often-overlooked task not only enhances the efficiency of the HVAC unit but also contributes to healthier indoor air quality, an essential factor for any home environment.


Air filters are the first line of defense against dust, pollen, and other airborne particles. Over time, these filters can become clogged with debris, reducing airflow and forcing your HVAC system to work harder than it should. This not only increases energy consumption but also shortens the lifespan of your unit. To prepare for intense summer heat, it is advisable to inspect and replace air filters regularly-typically every one to three months depending on usage and environmental conditions. Opting for high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters can further enhance filtration capabilities, capturing even smaller particles that could affect respiratory health.


In addition to air filter maintenance, attention must also be given to the ductwork within your mobile home. Ducts play a pivotal role in distributing cooled or heated air throughout your living space. However, they can accumulate dust, mold, and other contaminants over time if not properly maintained. Dirty ducts not only hinder airflow but can also become breeding grounds for allergens that exacerbate health issues like asthma or allergies.


To ensure optimal performance during summer months, consider scheduling a professional duct cleaning service at least once every few years. Professionals have specialized tools that effectively remove buildup without damaging the ductwork itself. Moreover, they can identify potential leaks or damage in the ducts that might otherwise go unnoticed but contribute significantly to energy waste.


Additionally, sealing any leaks in ductwork is vital as leaks lead to loss of conditioned air before it even reaches its intended destination. This inefficiency results in higher cooling costs and increased wear on your HVAC system as it struggles to maintain desired temperatures.


While professional services provide thorough cleaning solutions, there are simple steps homeowners can take themselves between professional visits: regularly vacuuming vents and registers helps minimize dust accumulation; using a damp cloth for wiping down accessible parts ensures cleaner surfaces; keeping surrounding areas clear of clutter encourages better airflow around vents.


Ultimately, diligent maintenance of air filters and ducts is an investment towards a comfortable living space during harsh summers while promoting energy efficiency year-round within mobile homes-a win-win situation both financially and environmentally speaking! Regular upkeep not only reduces strain on machinery but promotes healthier breathing environments conducive towards overall well-being-making those hot summer days just another opportunity instead rather than something dreaded altogether!

Techniques for Mapping Duct Layouts

Tools and Technologies for Accurate Duct Mapping

As the sweltering summer months approach, preparing your mobile home for intense heat becomes paramount. One critical aspect of this preparation is checking and sealing air leaks in your mobile home's HVAC system. Ensuring that your HVAC unit operates efficiently not only keeps your home comfortable but also helps you save on energy costs.


Mobile homes, by design, can be more susceptible to air leaks compared to traditional houses. This is due in part to their construction materials and methods, which often include lighter materials that can shift over time. As a result, gaps or cracks may develop in various places like windows, doors, wall seams, and around the HVAC system itself. These small openings might seem insignificant at first glance, but collectively they can lead to significant energy loss.


To begin addressing this issue, conduct a thorough inspection of your mobile home. Start with the most obvious areas: check around windows and doors for any visible gaps or drafts. You can use a simple trick by holding a lit incense stick near these areas; if the smoke wavers noticeably or is sucked outwards, you've likely found an air leak.


Next, examine less obvious locations such as electrical outlets, light fixtures, and plumbing penetrations where pipes enter or exit walls. These are common culprits for air leakage yet are often overlooked during routine checks.


Once identified, sealing these leaks is the next step. For larger gaps around windows and doors, weatherstripping provides an effective barrier against unwanted airflow. It's easy to apply and available in various forms to suit different needs-whether it's adhesive-backed foam tape for window sashes or V-strip weatherstripping for door frames.


For smaller cracks and gaps found around plumbing penetrations or electrical outlets, caulk is often the go-to solution. A high-quality silicone-based caulk works well because it remains flexible over time despite temperature variations-a crucial feature considering how much mobile homes expand and contract with seasonal changes.


Sealing ductwork is another important task when preparing your HVAC system for summer heat. Over time, ducts can develop leaks at joints or seams due to vibrations from daily use. Using mastic sealant or aluminum foil tape specifically designed for ductwork will ensure a tight seal that prevents conditioned air from escaping before it reaches its intended destination.


In addition to physical inspections and repairs of visible leaks, consider having a professional energy audit conducted on your mobile home. Specialists use sophisticated tools like blower doors and infrared cameras that detect even subtle sources of energy loss invisible to the naked eye.


By diligently checking and sealing air leaks throughout your mobile home's structure-and particularly within its HVAC system-you create an environment that's better insulated against external conditions. This ensures cool air stays inside where it belongs during those scorching summer days while keeping costly utility bills at bay.


Ultimately, taking proactive steps now not only prepares you for intense summer heat but also contributes positively towards sustainable living practices by reducing overall energy consumption-a win-win situation benefiting both homeowners' wallets and our planet's health alike.

Best Practices for Cleaner Airflow

As summer approaches with its relentless heat, mobile home residents find themselves grappling with the challenge of maintaining a cool and comfortable environment. Mobile homes, by their nature, often have less insulation and more exposure to external temperatures, making them particularly susceptible to intense summer heat. One of the most effective strategies for combating this issue is upgrading to energy-efficient components in their HVAC units.


Energy efficiency is not just a buzzword; it's a practical approach that can lead to significant improvements in comfort and savings. By upgrading key components of an HVAC system, mobile home owners can ensure that their cooling systems operate at optimal performance levels while consuming less energy.


The first step in this process is evaluating the current HVAC system. Many older units were not designed with modern energy efficiency standards in mind. Upgrading components such as compressors, fans, and thermostats can drastically reduce the amount of electricity needed to cool a home. Energy-efficient compressors are designed to use less power while providing the same level of cooling output as traditional models. Similarly, variable-speed fans adjust their speed based on the cooling demand, ensuring that they only use as much energy as necessary.


Thermostats also play a crucial role in enhancing energy efficiency. Modern programmable thermostats allow homeowners to set specific temperatures for different times of the day. This means that during peak sunlight hours when no one is home, the air conditioning can be set to a higher temperature, reducing unnecessary power consumption.


Another important upgrade involves improving ductwork and sealing leaks. Poorly sealed ducts can lead to significant loss of cooled air before it even reaches living spaces. By sealing these leaks and potentially insulating ducts that run through unconditioned spaces like attics or crawl spaces, homeowners can ensure that their system works efficiently without wasting energy.


Moreover, adopting energy-efficient practices extends beyond mechanical components; it includes using high-efficiency filters which improve airflow while capturing more particles from circulating air. Clean filters mean better air quality and less strain on HVAC systems leading them to function more effectively over longer periods without needing excessive maintenance or repairs.


Investing in these upgrades may seem daunting initially due to upfront costs but consider it an investment into one's long-term comfort and financial well-being. Not only do these changes contribute towards reducing monthly utility bills by lowering electricity usage but they also extend equipment lifespan thus delaying expensive replacements down line further saving money long-term basis too!


Additionally environmental impact cannot be overlooked here either: reduced power consumption equates fewer greenhouse gases emitted into atmosphere from fossil fuel-based electric generation plants thereby doing part help combat climate change effects globally!


In conclusion preparing mobile home HVAC units for intense summer heat by upgrading them with efficient components proves crucial both financially environmentally alike offering residents peace mind knowing they'll stay comfortably cool throughout hottest months year ahead!

Case Studies of Improved Air Quality in Mobile Homes

As the sweltering days of summer approach, mobile home owners face the annual challenge of keeping their living spaces comfortably cool. Unlike traditional homes, mobile homes often have unique heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) needs due to their construction and size. One crucial aspect of preparing these units for intense summer heat is programming thermostats for optimal performance.


Programming a thermostat may seem like a small task, but it can significantly impact energy efficiency and indoor comfort. A well-programmed thermostat ensures that your HVAC system works smarter, not harder, which is particularly important during the peak heat of summer when energy consumption tends to spike.


The first step in programming a thermostat is understanding your daily routine. Mobile home life can be dynamic; however, identifying patterns such as when you wake up, leave for work, return home, and go to bed allows you to set specific temperatures for different times of the day. For instance, setting a slightly higher temperature while you are away can conserve energy without sacrificing comfort.


Advanced thermostats offer even more precision with features like zoning and remote access. Zoning allows you to control temperatures in different areas or rooms independently. This means you can focus cooling efforts on the most frequently used parts of your mobile home while maintaining moderate temperatures in less occupied spaces. Coupled with remote access via smartphone apps or smart home systems, you gain flexibility in adjusting settings based on real-time needs or unexpected schedule changes.


Moreover, incorporating setbacks into your programming strategy helps reduce wear and tear on your HVAC system. By allowing the temperature to rise a few degrees during cooler periods (such as early morning or late evening), your unit won't need to cycle on and off excessively-a practice that extends its lifespan and reduces utility bills.


Equally important is regular maintenance of both the thermostat and HVAC unit itself. Dusting sensors and checking battery levels ensure accurate readings and reliable functionality throughout the season. Additionally, inspecting air filters monthly keeps airflow unobstructed-essential not only for effective cooling but also for preventing unnecessary strain on your system.


In conclusion, optimizing thermostat settings plays an integral role in preparing mobile home HVAC units for intense summer heat. Through thoughtful programming tailored to daily routines and utilizing advanced features like zoning and remote access, homeowners can achieve both comfort and cost savings during even the hottest months. As technology continues evolving towards smarter solutions-embracing these advancements promises an easier transition into each new season's demands while safeguarding our resources efficiently yet comfortably within our cherished homes-on-wheels.

As the sweltering summer months approach, ensuring that your mobile home's HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning) unit is prepared to handle intense heat is crucial. Regular maintenance schedules and professional inspections are not just recommended-they are essential for optimal performance, energy efficiency, and lifespan extension of your system. By dedicating time to these practices, you can ensure a comfortable living environment while avoiding unexpected breakdowns during peak usage.


Regular maintenance schedules act as a preventive measure against potential issues that could arise in your HVAC system. Just like any other mechanical equipment, HVAC units require routine care to function at their best. This involves cleaning or replacing air filters monthly, which is one of the simplest yet most effective tasks. A clean filter improves air quality and allows the system to operate more efficiently by preventing dust and debris from clogging the airflow.


Additionally, checking thermostat settings ensures that your home remains at a consistent and comfortable temperature without overworking the unit. Regularly inspecting ductwork for leaks or blockages is also crucial; even minor obstructions can lead to significant inefficiencies and increased energy bills. Keeping outdoor units free from debris such as leaves or grass clippings ensures unobstructed airflow-a critical factor when temperatures rise dramatically.


While regular maintenance tasks can often be managed by homeowners themselves, enlisting professional inspections at least once a year provides an added layer of assurance. Certified HVAC technicians possess the expertise to identify potential problems before they escalate into costly repairs or replacements. During an inspection, professionals will thoroughly examine components such as coils, fans, motors, electrical connections, and refrigerant levels-areas that may be overlooked in routine checks.


Professional inspections also offer peace of mind by verifying that each component operates safely and efficiently according to manufacturer specifications. Technicians can provide valuable insights into improving energy efficiency through upgrades or adjustments tailored specifically for mobile homes-a consideration given their unique structural characteristics compared to traditional houses.


Investing in regular maintenance schedules coupled with professional inspections ultimately translates into long-term savings on energy costs and repair expenses. It prolongs the life of your HVAC unit while ensuring it performs optimally during periods of intense summer heat-a time when reliable cooling becomes indispensable for comfort and well-being.


In conclusion, preparing your mobile home's HVAC unit for intense summer heat requires commitment to regular maintenance schedules and professional inspections. These practices not only enhance performance but also safeguard against unexpected malfunctions when you need cool air the most. By taking proactive steps now, you ensure both comfort today and cost-efficiency tomorrow-truly making every degree count as temperatures soar outside.

 

An air filter being cleaned

Indoor air quality (IAQ) is the air quality within buildings and structures. Poor indoor air quality due to indoor air pollution is known to affect the health, comfort, and well-being of building occupants. It has also been linked to sick building syndrome, respiratory issues, reduced productivity, and impaired learning in schools. Common pollutants of indoor air include: secondhand tobacco smoke, air pollutants from indoor combustion, radon, molds and other allergens, carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds, legionella and other bacteria, asbestos fibers, carbon dioxide,[1] ozone and particulates.

Source control, filtration, and the use of ventilation to dilute contaminants are the primary methods for improving indoor air quality. Although ventilation is an integral component of maintaining good indoor air quality, it may not be satisfactory alone.[2] In scenarios where outdoor pollution would deteriorate indoor air quality, other treatment devices such as filtration may also be necessary.[3]

IAQ is evaluated through collection of air samples, monitoring human exposure to pollutants, analysis of building surfaces, and computer modeling of air flow inside buildings. IAQ is part of indoor environmental quality (IEQ), along with other factors that exert an influence on physical and psychological aspects of life indoors (e.g., lighting, visual quality, acoustics, and thermal comfort).[4]

Indoor air pollution is a major health hazard in developing countries and is commonly referred to as "household air pollution" in that context.[5] It is mostly relating to cooking and heating methods by burning biomass fuel, in the form of wood, charcoal, dung, and crop residue, in indoor environments that lack proper ventilation. Millions of people, primarily women and children, face serious health risks. In total, about three billion people in developing countries are affected by this problem. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that cooking-related indoor air pollution causes 3.8 million annual deaths.[6] The Global Burden of Disease study estimated the number of deaths in 2017 at 1.6 million.[7]

Definition

[edit]

For health reasons it is crucial to breathe clean air, free from chemicals and toxicants as much as possible. It is estimated that humans spend approximately 90% of their lifetime indoors[8] and that indoor air pollution in some places can be much worse than that of the ambient air.[9][10]

Various factors contribute to high concentrations of pollutants indoors, ranging from influx of pollutants from external sources, off-gassing by furniture, furnishings including carpets, indoor activities (cooking, cleaning, painting, smoking, etc. in homes to using office equipment in offices), thermal comfort parameters such as temperature, humidity, airflow and physio-chemical properties of the indoor air.[citation needed] Air pollutants can enter a building in many ways, including through open doors or windows. Poorly maintained air conditioners/ventilation systems can harbor mold, bacteria, and other contaminants, which are then circulated throughout indoor spaces, contributing to respiratory problems and allergies.

There have been many debates among indoor air quality specialists about the proper definition of indoor air quality and specifically what constitutes "acceptable" indoor air quality.

Health effects

[edit]
Share of deaths from indoor air pollution. Darker colors mean higher numbers.

IAQ is significant for human health as humans spend a large proportion of their time in indoor environments. Americans and Europeans on average spend approximately 90% of their time indoors.[11][12]

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 3.2 million people die prematurely every year from illnesses attributed to indoor air pollution caused by indoor cooking, with over 237 thousand of these being children under 5. These include around an eighth of all global ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and lung cancer deaths. Overall the WHO estimated that poor indoor air quality resulted in the loss of 86 million healthy life years in 2019.[13]

Studies in the UK and Europe show exposure to indoor air pollutants, chemicals and biological contamination can irritate the upper airway system, trigger or exacerbate asthma and other respiratory or cardiovascular conditions, and may even have carcinogenic effects.[14][15][16][17][18][19]

Poor indoor air quality can cause sick building syndrome. Symptoms include burning of the eyes, scratchy throat, blocked nose, and headaches.[20]

Common pollutants

[edit]

Generated by indoor combustion

[edit]
a 3-stone stove
A traditional wood-fired 3-stone stove in Guatemala, which causes indoor air pollution

Indoor combustion, such as for cooking or heating, is a major cause of indoor air pollution and causes significant health harms and premature deaths. Hydrocarbon fires cause air pollution. Pollution is caused by both biomass and fossil fuels of various types, but some forms of fuels are more harmful than others.

Indoor fire can produce black carbon particles, nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, and mercury compounds, among other emissions.[21] Around 3 billion people cook over open fires or on rudimentary cook stoves. Cooking fuels are coal, wood, animal dung, and crop residues.[22] IAQ is a particular concern in low and middle-income countries where such practices are common.[23]

Cooking using natural gas (also called fossil gas, methane gas or simply gas) is associated with poorer indoor air quality. Combustion of gas produces nitrogen dioxide and carbon monixide, and can lead to increased concentrations of nitrogen dioxide throughout the home environment which is linked to respiratory issues and diseases.[24][25]

Carbon monoxide

[edit]

One of the most acutely toxic indoor air contaminants is carbon monoxide (CO), a colourless and odourless gas that is a by-product of incomplete combustion. Carbon monoxide may be emitted from tobacco smoke and generated from malfunctioning fuel burning stoves (wood, kerosene, natural gas, propane) and fuel burning heating systems (wood, oil, natural gas) and from blocked flues connected to these appliances.[26] In developed countries the main sources of indoor CO emission come from cooking and heating devices that burn fossil fuels and are faulty, incorrectly installed or poorly maintained.[27] Appliance malfunction may be due to faulty installation or lack of maintenance and proper use.[26] In low- and middle-income countries the most common sources of CO in homes are burning biomass fuels and cigarette smoke.[27]

Health effects of CO poisoning may be acute or chronic and can occur unintentionally or intentionally (self-harm). By depriving the brain of oxygen, acute exposure to carbon monoxide may have effects on the neurological system (headache, nausea, dizziness, alteration in consciousness and subjective weakness), the cardiovascular and respiratory systems (myocardial infarction, shortness of breath, or rapid breathing, respiratory failure). Acute exposure can also lead to long-term neurological effects such as cognitive and behavioural changes. Severe CO poisoning may lead to unconsciousness, coma and death. Chronic exposure to low concentrations of carbon monoxide may lead to lethargy, headaches, nausea, flu-like symptoms and neuropsychological and cardiovascular issues.[28][26]

The WHO recommended levels of indoor CO exposure in 24 hours is 4 mg/m3.[29] Acute exposure should not exceed 10 mg/m3 in 8 hours, 35 mg/m3 in one hour and 100 mg/m3 in 15 minutes.[27]

Secondhand tobacco smoke

[edit]

Secondhand smoke is tobacco smoke which affects people other than the 'active' smoker. It is made up of the exhaled smoke (15%) and mostly of smoke coming from the burning end of the cigarette, known as sidestream smoke (85%).[30]

Secondhand smoke contains more than 7000 chemicals, of which hundreds are harmful to health.[30] Secondhand tobacco smoke includes both a gaseous and a particulate materials which, with particular hazards arising from levels of carbon monoxide and very small particulates (fine particulate matter, especially PM2.5 and PM10) which get into the bronchioles and alveoles in the lung.[31] Inhaling secondhand smoke on multiple occasions can cause asthma, pneumonia, lung cancer, and sudden infant death syndrome, among other conditions.[32]

Thirdhand smoke (THS) refers to chemicals that settle on objects and bodies indoors after smoking. Exposure to thirdhand smoke can happen even after the actual cigarette smoke is not present anymore and affect those entering the indoor environment much later. Toxic substances of THS can react with other chemicals in the air and produce new toxic chemicals that are otherwise not present in cigarettes.[33]

The only certain method to improve indoor air quality as regards secondhand smoke is to eliminate smoking indoors.[34] Indoor e-cigarette use also increases home particulate matter concentrations.[35]

Particulates

[edit]

Atmospheric particulate matter, also known as particulates, can be found indoors and can affect the health of occupants. Indoor particulate matter can come from different indoor sources or be created as secondary aerosols through indoor gas-to-particle reactions. They can also be outdoor particles that enter indoors. These indoor particles vary widely in size, ranging from nanomet (nanoparticles/ultrafine particles emitted from combustion sources) to micromet (resuspensed dust).[36] Particulate matter can also be produced through cooking activities. Frying produces higher concentrations than boiling or grilling and cooking meat produces higher concentrations than cooking vegetables.[37] Preparing a Thanksgiving dinner can produce very high concentrations of particulate matter, exceeding 300 μg/m3.[38]

Particulates can penetrate deep into the lungs and brain from blood streams, causing health problems such as heart disease, lung disease, cancer and preterm birth.[39]

Generated from building materials, furnishing and consumer products

[edit]

Volatile organic compounds

[edit]

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) include a variety of chemicals, some of which may have short- and long-term adverse health effects. There are numerous sources of VOCs indoors, which means that their concentrations are consistently higher indoors (up to ten times higher) than outdoors.[40] Some VOCs are emitted directly indoors, and some are formed through the subsequent chemical reactions that can occur in the gas-phase, or on surfaces.[41][42] VOCs presenting health hazards include benzene, formaldehyde, tetrachloroethylene and trichloroethylene.[43]

VOCs are emitted by thousands of indoor products. Examples include: paints, varnishes, waxes and lacquers, paint strippers, cleaning and personal care products, pesticides, building materials and furnishings, office equipment such as copiers and printers, correction fluids and carbonless copy paper, graphics and craft materials including glues and adhesives, permanent markers, and photographic solutions.[44] Chlorinated drinking water releases chloroform when hot water is used in the home. Benzene is emitted from fuel stored in attached garages.

Human activities such as cooking and cleaning can also emit VOCs.[45][46] Cooking can release long-chain aldehydes and alkanes when oil is heated and terpenes can be released when spices are prepared and/or cooked.[45] Leaks of natural gas from cooking appliances have been linked to elevated levels of VOCs including benzene in homes in the USA.[47] Cleaning products contain a range of VOCs, including monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, alcohols and esters. Once released into the air, VOCs can undergo reactions with ozone and hydroxyl radicals to produce other VOCs, such as formaldehyde.[46]

Health effects include eye, nose, and throat irritation; headaches, loss of coordination, nausea; and damage to the liver, kidney, and central nervous system.[48]

Testing emissions from building materials used indoors has become increasingly common for floor coverings, paints, and many other important indoor building materials and finishes.[49] Indoor materials such as gypsum boards or carpet act as VOC 'sinks', by trapping VOC vapors for extended periods of time, and releasing them by outgassing. The VOCs can also undergo transformation at the surface through interaction with ozone.[42] In both cases, these delayed emissions can result in chronic and low-level exposures to VOCs.[50]

Several initiatives aim to reduce indoor air contamination by limiting VOC emissions from products. There are regulations in France and in Germany, and numerous voluntary ecolabels and rating systems containing low VOC emissions criteria such as EMICODE,[51] M1,[52] Blue Angel[53] and Indoor Air Comfort[54] in Europe, as well as California Standard CDPH Section 01350[55] and several others in the US. Due to these initiatives an increasing number of low-emitting products became available to purchase.

At least 18 microbial VOCs (MVOCs) have been characterised[56][57] including 1-octen-3-ol (mushroom alcohol), 3-Methylfuran, 2-pentanol, 2-hexanone, 2-heptanone, 3-octanone, 3-octanol, 2-octen-1-ol, 1-octene, 2-pentanone, 2-nonanone, borneol, geosmin, 1-butanol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, 3-methyl-2-butanol, and thujopsene. The last four are products of Stachybotrys chartarum, which has been linked with sick building syndrome.[56]

Asbestos fibers

[edit]

Many common building materials used before 1975 contain asbestos, such as some floor tiles, ceiling tiles, shingles, fireproofing, heating systems, pipe wrap, taping muds, mastics, and other insulation materials. Normally, significant releases of asbestos fiber do not occur unless the building materials are disturbed, such as by cutting, sanding, drilling, or building remodelling. Removal of asbestos-containing materials is not always optimal because the fibers can be spread into the air during the removal process. A management program for intact asbestos-containing materials is often recommended instead.

When asbestos-containing material is damaged or disintegrates, microscopic fibers are dispersed into the air. Inhalation of asbestos fibers over long exposure times is associated with increased incidence of lung cancer, mesothelioma, and asbestosis. The risk of lung cancer from inhaling asbestos fibers is significantly greater for smokers. The symptoms of disease do not usually appear until about 20 to 30 years after the first exposure to asbestos.

Although all asbestos is hazardous, products that are friable, e.g. sprayed coatings and insulation, pose a significantly higher hazard as they are more likely to release fibers to the air.[58]

Microplastics

[edit]

Microplastic is a type of airborne particulates and is found to prevail in air.[59][60][61][62] A 2017 study found indoor airborne microfiber concentrations between 1.0 and 60.0 microfibers per cubic meter (33% of which were found to be microplastics).[63] Airborne microplastic dust can be produced during renovation, building, bridge and road reconstruction projects[64] and the use of power tools.[65]

Ozone

[edit]

Indoors ozone (O3) is produced by certain high-voltage electric devices (such as air ionizers), and as a by-product of other types of pollution. It appears in lower concentrations indoors than outdoors, usually at 0.2-0.7 of the outdoor concentration.[66] Typically, most ozone is lost to surface reactions indoors, rather than to reactions in air, due to the large surface to volume ratios found indoors.[67]

Outdoor air used for ventilation may have sufficient ozone to react with common indoor pollutants as well as skin oils and other common indoor air chemicals or surfaces. Particular concern is warranted when using "green" cleaning products based on citrus or terpene extracts, because these chemicals react very quickly with ozone to form toxic and irritating chemicals[46] as well as fine and ultrafine particles.[68] Ventilation with outdoor air containing elevated ozone concentrations may complicate remediation attempts.[69]

The WHO standard for ozone concentration is 60 μg/m3 for long-term exposure and 100 μg/m3 as the maximum average over an 8-hour period.[29] The EPA standard for ozone concentration is 0.07 ppm average over an 8-hour period.[70]

Biological agents

[edit]

Mold and other allergens

[edit]

Occupants in buildings can be exposed to fungal spores, cell fragments, or mycotoxins which can arise from a host of means, but there are two common classes: (a) excess moisture induced growth of mold colonies and (b) natural substances released into the air such as animal dander and plant pollen.[71]

While mold growth is associated with high moisture levels,[72] it is likely to grow when a combination of favorable conditions arises. As well as high moisture levels, these conditions include suitable temperatures, pH and nutrient sources.[73] Mold grows primarily on surfaces, and it reproduces by releasing spores, which can travel and settle in different locations. When these spores experience appropriate conditions, they can germinate and lead to mycelium growth.[74] Different mold species favor different environmental conditions to germinate and grow, some being more hydrophilic (growing at higher levels of relative humidity) and other more xerophilic (growing at levels of relative humidity as low as 75–80%).[74][75]

Mold growth can be inhibited by keeping surfaces at conditions that are further from condensation, with relative humidity levels below 75%. This usually translates to a relative humidity of indoor air below 60%, in agreement with the guidelines for thermal comfort that recommend a relative humidity between 40 and 60 %. Moisture buildup in buildings may arise from water penetrating areas of the building envelope or fabric, from plumbing leaks, rainwater or groundwater penetration, or from condensation due to improper ventilation, insufficient heating or poor thermal quality of the building envelope.[76] Even something as simple as drying clothes indoors on radiators can increase the risk of mold growth, if the humidity produced is not able to escape the building via ventilation.[77]

Mold predominantly affects the airways and lungs. Known effects of mold on health include asthma development and exacerbation,[78] with children and elderly at greater risk of more severe health impacts.[79] Infants in homes with mold have a much greater risk of developing asthma and allergic rhinitis.[80][71] More than half of adult workers in moldy or humid buildings suffer from nasal or sinus symptoms due to mold exposure.[71] Some varieties of mold contain toxic compounds (mycotoxins). However, exposure to hazardous levels of mycotoxin via inhalation is not possible in most cases, as toxins are produced by the fungal body and are not at significant levels in the released spores.

Legionella

[edit]

Legionnaires' disease is caused by a waterborne bacterium Legionella that grows best in slow-moving or still, warm water. The primary route of exposure is through the creation of an aerosol effect, most commonly from evaporative cooling towers or showerheads. A common source of Legionella in commercial buildings is from poorly placed or maintained evaporative cooling towers, which often release water in an aerosol which may enter nearby ventilation intakes. Outbreaks in medical facilities and nursing homes, where patients are immuno-suppressed and immuno-weak, are the most commonly reported cases of Legionellosis. More than one case has involved outdoor fountains at public attractions. The presence of Legionella in commercial building water supplies is highly under-reported, as healthy people require heavy exposure to acquire infection.

Legionella testing typically involves collecting water samples and surface swabs from evaporative cooling basins, shower heads, faucets/taps, and other locations where warm water collects. The samples are then cultured and colony forming units (cfu) of Legionella are quantified as cfu/liter.

Legionella is a parasite of protozoans such as amoeba, and thus requires conditions suitable for both organisms. The bacterium forms a biofilm which is resistant to chemical and antimicrobial treatments, including chlorine. Remediation for Legionella outbreaks in commercial buildings vary, but often include very hot water flushes (160 °F (71 °C)), sterilisation of standing water in evaporative cooling basins, replacement of shower heads, and, in some cases, flushes of heavy metal salts. Preventive measures include adjusting normal hot water levels to allow for 120 °F (49 °C) at the tap, evaluating facility design layout, removing faucet aerators, and periodic testing in suspect areas.

Other bacteria

[edit]
Airborne bacteria

There are many bacteria of health significance found in indoor air and on indoor surfaces. The role of microbes in the indoor environment is increasingly studied using modern gene-based analysis of environmental samples. Currently, efforts are under way to link microbial ecologists and indoor air scientists to forge new methods for analysis and to better interpret the results.[81]

A large fraction of the bacteria found in indoor air and dust are shed from humans. Among the most important bacteria known to occur in indoor air are Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae.[citation needed]

Virus

[edit]
Ninth floor layout of the Metropole Hotel in Hong Kong, showing where an outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) occurred

Viruses can also be a concern for indoor air quality. During the 2002–2004 SARS outbreak, virus-laden aerosols were found to have seeped into bathrooms from the bathroom floor drains, exacerbated by the draw of bathroom exhaust fans, resulting in the rapid spread of SARS in Amoy Gardens in Hong Kong.[82][83] Elsewhere in Hong Kong, SARS CoV RNA was found on the carpet and in the air intake vents of the Metropole Hotel, which showed that secondary environmental contamination could generate infectious aerosols and resulted in superspreading events.[84]

Carbon dioxide

[edit]

Humans are the main indoor source of carbon dioxide (CO2) in most buildings. Indoor CO2 levels are an indicator of the adequacy of outdoor air ventilation relative to indoor occupant density and metabolic activity.

Indoor CO2 levels above 500 ppm can lead to higher blood pressure and heart rate, and increased peripheral blood circulation.[85] With CO2 concentrations above 1000 ppm cognitive performance might be affected, especially when doing complex tasks, making decision making and problem solving slower but not less accurate.[86][87] However, evidence on the health effects of CO2 at lower concentrations is conflicting and it is difficult to link CO2 to health impacts at exposures below 5000 ppm – reported health outcomes may be due to the presence of human bioeffluents, and other indoor air pollutants related to inadequate ventilation.[88]

Indoor carbon dioxide concentrations can be used to evaluate the quality of a room or a building's ventilation.[89] To eliminate most complaints caused by CO2, the total indoor CO2 level should be reduced to a difference of no greater than 700 ppm above outdoor levels.[90] The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) considers that indoor air concentrations of carbon dioxide that exceed 1000 ppm are a marker suggesting inadequate ventilation.[91] The UK standards for schools say that carbon dioxide levels of 800 ppm or lower indicate that the room is well-ventilated.[92] Regulations and standards from around the world show that CO2 levels below 1000 ppm represent good IAQ, between 1000 and 1500 ppm represent moderate IAQ and greater than 1500 ppm represent poor IAQ.[88]

Carbon dioxide concentrations in closed or confined rooms can increase to 1,000 ppm within 45 minutes of enclosure. For example, in a 3.5-by-4-metre (11 ft × 13 ft) sized office, atmospheric carbon dioxide increased from 500 ppm to over 1,000 ppm within 45 minutes of ventilation cessation and closure of windows and doors.[93]

Radon

[edit]

Radon is an invisible, radioactive atomic gas that results from the radioactive decay of radium, which may be found in rock formations beneath buildings or in certain building materials themselves.

Radon is probably the most pervasive serious hazard for indoor air in the United States and Europe. It is a major cause of lung cancer, responsible for 3–14% of cases in countries, leading to tens of thousands of deaths.[94]

Radon gas enters buildings as a soil gas. As it is a heavy gas it will tend to accumulate at the lowest level. Radon may also be introduced into a building through drinking water particularly from bathroom showers. Building materials can be a rare source of radon, but little testing is carried out for stone, rock or tile products brought into building sites; radon accumulation is greatest for well insulated homes.[95] There are simple do-it-yourself kits for radon gas testing, but a licensed professional can also check homes.

The half-life for radon is 3.8 days, indicating that once the source is removed, the hazard will be greatly reduced within a few weeks. Radon mitigation methods include sealing concrete slab floors, basement foundations, water drainage systems, or by increasing ventilation.[96] They are usually cost effective and can greatly reduce or even eliminate the contamination and the associated health risks.[citation needed]

Radon is measured in picocuries per liter of air (pCi/L) or becquerel per cubic meter (Bq m-3). Both are measurements of radioactivity. The World Health Organization (WHO) sets the ideal indoor radon levels at 100 Bq/m-3.[97] In the United States, it is recommend to fix homes with radon levels at or above 4 pCi/L. At the same time it is also recommends that people think about fixing their homes for radon levels between 2 pCi/L and 4 pCi/L.[98] In the United Kingdom the ideal is presence of radon indoors is 100 Bq/m-3. Action needs to be taken in homes with 200 Bq/m−3 or more.[99]

Interactive maps of radon affected areas are available for various regions and countries of the world.[100][101][102]

IAQ and climate change

[edit]

Indoor air quality is linked inextricably to outdoor air quality. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has varying scenarios that predict how the climate will change in the future.[103] Climate change can affect indoor air quality by increasing the level of outdoor air pollutants such as ozone and particulate matter, for example through emissions from wildfires caused by extreme heat and drought.[104][105] Numerous predictions for how indoor air pollutants will change have been made,[106][107][108][109] and models have attempted to predict how the forecasted IPCC scenarios will vary indoor air quality and indoor comfort parameters such as humidity and temperature.[110]

The net-zero challenge requires significant changes in the performance of both new and retrofitted buildings. However, increased energy efficient housing will trap pollutants inside, whether produced indoors or outdoors, and lead to an increase in human exposure.[111][112]

Indoor air quality standards and monitoring

[edit]

Quality guidelines and standards

[edit]

For occupational exposure, there are standards, which cover a wide range of chemicals, and applied to healthy adults who are exposed over time at workplaces (usually industrial environments).These are published by organisations such as Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE).

There is no consensus globally about indoor air quality standards, or health-based guidelines. However, there are regulations from some individual countries and from health organisations. For example, the World Health Organization (WHO) has published health-based global air quality guidelines for the general population that are applicable both to outdoor and indoor air,[29] as well as the WHO IAQ guidelines for selected compounds,[113] whereas the UK Health Security Agency published IAQ guidelines for selected VOCs.[114] The Scientific and Technical Committee (STC34) of the International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate (ISIAQ) created an open database that collects indoor environmental quality guidelines worldwide.[115] The database is focused on indoor air quality (IAQ), but is currently extended to include standards, regulations, and guidelines related to ventilation, comfort, acoustics, and lighting.[116][117]

Real-time monitoring

[edit]

Since indoor air pollutants can adversely affect human health, it is important to have real-time indoor air quality assessment/monitoring system that can help not only in the improvement of indoor air quality but also help in detection of leaks, spills in a work environment and boost energy efficiency of buildings by providing real-time feedback to the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system(s).[118] Additionally, there have been enough studies that highlight the correlation between poor indoor air quality and loss of performance and productivity of workers in an office setting.[119]  

Combining the Internet of Things (IoT) technology with real-time IAQ monitoring systems has  tremendously gained momentum and popularity as interventions can be done based on the real-time sensor data and thus help in the IAQ improvement.[120]   

Improvement measures

[edit]

Indoor air quality can be addressed, achieved or maintained during the design of new buildings or as mitigating measures in existing buildings. A hierarchy of measures has been proposed by the Institute of Air Quality Management. It emphasises removing pollutant sources, reducing emissions from any remaining sources, disrupting pathways between sources and the people exposed, protecting people from exposure to pollutants, and removing people from areas with poor air quality.[121]

A report assisted by the Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance can support in the systematic investigation of individual health problems arising at indoor workplaces, and in the identification of practical solutions.[122]

Source control

[edit]

HVAC design

[edit]

Environmentally sustainable design concepts include aspects of commercial and residential heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) technologies. Among several considerations, one of the topics attended to is the issue of indoor air quality throughout the design and construction stages of a building's life.[citation needed]

One technique to reduce energy consumption while maintaining adequate air quality, is demand-controlled ventilation. Instead of setting throughput at a fixed air replacement rate, carbon dioxide sensors are used to control the rate dynamically, based on the emissions of actual building occupants.[citation needed]

One way of quantitatively ensuring the health of indoor air is by the frequency of effective turnover of interior air by replacement with outside air. In the UK, for example, classrooms are required to have 2.5 outdoor air changes per hour. In halls, gym, dining, and physiotherapy spaces, the ventilation should be sufficient to limit carbon dioxide to 1,500 ppm. In the US, ventilation in classrooms is based on the amount of outdoor air per occupant plus the amount of outdoor air per unit of floor area, not air changes per hour. Since carbon dioxide indoors comes from occupants and outdoor air, the adequacy of ventilation per occupant is indicated by the concentration indoors minus the concentration outdoors. The value of 615 ppm above the outdoor concentration indicates approximately 15 cubic feet per minute of outdoor air per adult occupant doing sedentary office work where outdoor air contains over 400 ppm[123] (global average as of 2023). In classrooms, the requirements in the ASHRAE standard 62.1, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, would typically result in about 3 air changes per hour, depending on the occupant density. As the occupants are not the only source of pollutants, outdoor air ventilation may need to be higher when unusual or strong sources of pollution exist indoors.

When outdoor air is polluted, bringing in more outdoor air can actually worsen the overall quality of the indoor air and exacerbate some occupant symptoms related to outdoor air pollution. Generally, outdoor country air is better than indoor city air.[citation needed]

The use of air filters can trap some of the air pollutants. Portable room air cleaners with HEPA filters can be used if ventilation is poor or outside air has high level of PM 2.5.[122] Air filters are used to reduce the amount of dust that reaches the wet coils.[citation needed] Dust can serve as food to grow molds on the wet coils and ducts and can reduce the efficiency of the coils.[citation needed]

The use of trickle vents on windows is also valuable to maintain constant ventilation. They can help prevent mold and allergen build up in the home or workplace. They can also reduce the spread of some respiratory infections.[124]

Moisture management and humidity control requires operating HVAC systems as designed. Moisture management and humidity control may conflict with efforts to conserve energy. For example, moisture management and humidity control requires systems to be set to supply make-up air at lower temperatures (design levels), instead of the higher temperatures sometimes used to conserve energy in cooling-dominated climate conditions. However, for most of the US and many parts of Europe and Japan, during the majority of hours of the year, outdoor air temperatures are cool enough that the air does not need further cooling to provide thermal comfort indoors.[citation needed] However, high humidity outdoors creates the need for careful attention to humidity levels indoors. High humidity give rise to mold growth and moisture indoors is associated with a higher prevalence of occupant respiratory problems.[citation needed]

The "dew point temperature" is an absolute measure of the moisture in air. Some facilities are being designed with dew points in the lower 50s °F, and some in the upper and lower 40s °F.[citation needed] Some facilities are being designed using desiccant wheels with gas-fired heaters to dry out the wheel enough to get the required dew points.[citation needed] On those systems, after the moisture is removed from the make-up air, a cooling coil is used to lower the temperature to the desired level.[citation needed]

Commercial buildings, and sometimes residential, are often kept under slightly positive air pressure relative to the outdoors to reduce infiltration. Limiting infiltration helps with moisture management and humidity control.

Dilution of indoor pollutants with outdoor air is effective to the extent that outdoor air is free of harmful pollutants. Ozone in outdoor air occurs indoors at reduced concentrations because ozone is highly reactive with many chemicals found indoors. The products of the reactions between ozone and many common indoor pollutants include organic compounds that may be more odorous, irritating, or toxic than those from which they are formed. These products of ozone chemistry include formaldehyde, higher molecular weight aldehydes, acidic aerosols, and fine and ultrafine particles, among others. The higher the outdoor ventilation rate, the higher the indoor ozone concentration and the more likely the reactions will occur, but even at low levels, the reactions will take place. This suggests that ozone should be removed from ventilation air, especially in areas where outdoor ozone levels are frequently high.

Effect of indoor plants

[edit]
Spider plants (Chlorophytum comosum) absorb some airborne contaminants.

Houseplants together with the medium in which they are grown can reduce components of indoor air pollution, particularly volatile organic compounds (VOC) such as benzene, toluene, and xylene. Plants remove CO2 and release oxygen and water, although the quantitative impact for house plants is small. The interest in using potted plants for removing VOCs was sparked by a 1989 NASA study conducted in sealed chambers designed to replicate the environment on space stations. However, these results suffered from poor replication[125] and are not applicable to typical buildings, where outdoor-to-indoor air exchange already removes VOCs at a rate that could only be matched by the placement of 10–1000 plants/m2 of a building's floor space.[126]

Plants also appear to reduce airborne microbes and molds, and to increase humidity.[127] However, the increased humidity can itself lead to increased levels of mold and even VOCs.[128]

Since extremely high humidity is associated with increased mold growth, allergic responses, and respiratory responses, the presence of additional moisture from houseplants may not be desirable in all indoor settings if watering is done inappropriately.[129]

Institutional programs

[edit]
EPA graphic about asthma triggers

The topic of IAQ has become popular due to the greater awareness of health problems caused by mold and triggers to asthma and allergies.

In the US, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed an "IAQ Tools for Schools" program to help improve the indoor environmental conditions in educational institutions. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health conducts Health Hazard Evaluations (HHEs) in workplaces at the request of employees, authorized representative of employees, or employers, to determine whether any substance normally found in the place of employment has potentially toxic effects, including indoor air quality.[130]

A variety of scientists work in the field of indoor air quality, including chemists, physicists, mechanical engineers, biologists, bacteriologists, epidemiologists, and computer scientists. Some of these professionals are certified by organizations such as the American Industrial Hygiene Association, the American Indoor Air Quality Council and the Indoor Environmental Air Quality Council.

In the UK, under the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, the Air Quality Expert Group considers current knowledge on indoor air quality and provides advice to government and devolved administration ministers.[131]

At the international level, the International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate (ISIAQ), formed in 1991, organizes two major conferences, the Indoor Air and the Healthy Buildings series.[132]

See also

[edit]
  • Environmental management
  • Healthy building
  • Indoor bioaerosol
  • Microbiomes of the built environment
  • Olfactory fatigue

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Carroll, GT; Kirschman, DL; Mammana, A (2022). "Increased CO2 levels in the operating room correlate with the number of healthcare workers present: an imperative for intentional crowd control". Patient Safety in Surgery. 16 (35): 35. doi:10.1186/s13037-022-00343-8. PMC 9672642. PMID 36397098.
  2. ^ ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, ASHRAE, Inc., Atlanta, GA, US
  3. ^ Belias, Evangelos; Licina, Dusan (2022). "Outdoor PM2. 5 air filtration: optimising indoor air quality and energy". Building & Cities. 3 (1): 186–203. doi:10.5334/bc.153.
  4. ^ KMC Controls (September 24, 2015). "What's Your IQ on IAQ and IEQ?". Archived from the original on April 12, 2021. Retrieved April 12, 2021.[unreliable source?]
  5. ^ Bruce, N; Perez-Padilla, R; Albalak, R (2000). "Indoor air pollution in developing countries: a major environmental and public health challenge". Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 78 (9): 1078–92. PMC 2560841. PMID 11019457.
  6. ^ "Household air pollution and health: fact sheet". WHO. May 8, 2018. Archived from the original on November 12, 2021. Retrieved November 21, 2020.
  7. ^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2019). "Access to Energy". Our World in Data. Archived from the original on November 1, 2021. Retrieved April 1, 2021. According to the Global Burden of Disease study 1.6 million people died prematurely in 2017 as a result of indoor air pollution ... But it's worth noting that the WHO publishes a substantially larger number of indoor air pollution deaths..
  8. ^ Klepeis, Neil E; Nelson, William C; Ott, Wayne R; Robinson, John P; Tsang, Andy M; Switzer, Paul; Behar, Joseph V; Hern, Stephen C; Engelmann, William H (July 2001). "The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants". Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 11 (3): 231–252. Bibcode:2001JESEE..11..231K. doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500165. PMID 11477521. S2CID 22445147. Archived from the original on March 28, 2023. Retrieved March 30, 2024.
  9. ^ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office equipment: design, indoor air emissions, and pollution prevention opportunities. Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, 1995.
  10. ^ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Unfinished business: a comparative assessment of environmental problems, EPA-230/2-87-025a-e (NTIS PB88-127030). Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, Washington, DC, 1987.
  11. ^ Klepeis, Neil E; Nelson, William C; Ott, Wayne R; Robinson, John P; Tsang, Andy M; Switzer, Paul; Behar, Joseph V; Hern, Stephen C; Engelmann, William H (July 1, 2001). "The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants". Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 11 (3): 231–252. Bibcode:2001JESEE..11..231K. doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500165. ISSN 1559-0631. PMID 11477521. Archived from the original on November 13, 2023. Retrieved November 13, 2023.
  12. ^ "Combined or multiple exposure to health stressors in indoor built environments: an evidence-based review prepared for the WHO training workshop "Multiple environmental exposures and risks": 16–18 October 2013, Bonn, Germany". World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. 2014. Archived from the original on November 6, 2023. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  13. ^ "Household air pollution". World Health Organization. December 15, 2023. Archived from the original on November 12, 2021. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  14. ^ Clark, Sierra N.; Lam, Holly C. Y.; Goode, Emma-Jane; Marczylo, Emma L.; Exley, Karen S.; Dimitroulopoulou, Sani (August 2, 2023). "The Burden of Respiratory Disease from Formaldehyde, Damp and Mould in English Housing". Environments. 10 (8): 136. doi:10.3390/environments10080136. ISSN 2076-3298.
  15. ^ "Chief Medical Officer (CMO): annual reports". GOV.UK. November 16, 2023. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  16. ^ "Project information | Indoor air quality at home | Quality standards | NICE". www.nice.org.uk. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  17. ^ "The inside story: Health effects of indoor air quality on children and young people". RCPCH. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  18. ^ Halios, Christos H.; Landeg-Cox, Charlotte; Lowther, Scott D.; Middleton, Alice; Marczylo, Tim; Dimitroulopoulou, Sani (September 15, 2022). "Chemicals in European residences – Part I: A review of emissions, concentrations and health effects of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)". Science of the Total Environment. 839: 156201. Bibcode:2022ScTEn.83956201H. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156201. ISSN 0048-9697. PMID 35623519.
  19. ^ "Literature review on chemical pollutants in indoor air in public settings for children and overview of their health effects with a focus on schools, kindergartens and day-care centres". www.who.int. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  20. ^ Burge, P S (February 2004). "Sick building syndrome". Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 61 (2): 185–190. doi:10.1136/oem.2003.008813. PMC 1740708. PMID 14739390.
  21. ^ Apte, K; Salvi, S (2016). "Household air pollution and its effects on health". F1000Research. 5: 2593. doi:10.12688/f1000research.7552.1. PMC 5089137. PMID 27853506. Burning of natural gas not only produces a variety of gases such as sulfur oxides, mercury compounds, and particulate matter but also leads to the production of nitrogen oxides, primarily nitrogen dioxide...The burning of biomass fuel or any other fossil fuel increases the concentration of black carbon in the air
  22. ^ "Improved Clean Cookstoves". Project Drawdown. February 7, 2020. Archived from the original on December 15, 2021. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
  23. ^ WHO indoor air quality guidelines: household fuel combustion. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2014. ISBN 978-92-4-154888-5.
  24. ^ "Clearing the Air: Gas Cooking and Pollution in European Homes". CLASP. November 8, 2023. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  25. ^ Seals, Brady; Krasner, Andee. "Gas Stoves: Health and Air Quality Impacts and Solutions". RMI. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  26. ^ a b c Myers, Isabella (February 2022). The efficient operation of regulation and legislation: An holistic approach to understanding the effect of Carbon Monoxide on mortality (PDF). CO Research Trust.
  27. ^ a b c Penney, David; Benignus, Vernon; Kephalopoulos, Stylianos; Kotzias, Dimitrios; Kleinman, Michael; Verrier, Agnes (2010), "Carbon monoxide", WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Selected Pollutants, World Health Organization, ISBN 978-92-890-0213-4, OCLC 696099951, archived from the original on March 8, 2021, retrieved March 18, 2024
  28. ^ "Carbon monoxide: toxicological overview". UK Health Security Agency. May 24, 2022. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
  29. ^ a b c WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide (PDF). World Health Organization. 2021. hdl:10665/345329. ISBN 978-92-4-003422-8.[page needed]
  30. ^ a b Soleimani, Farshid; Dobaradaran, Sina; De-la-Torre, Gabriel E.; Schmidt, Torsten C.; Saeedi, Reza (March 2022). "Content of toxic components of cigarette, cigarette smoke vs cigarette butts: A comprehensive systematic review". Science of the Total Environment. 813: 152667. Bibcode:2022ScTEn.81352667S. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152667. PMID 34963586.
  31. ^ "Considering smoking as an air pollution problem for environmental health | Environmental Performance Index". Archived from the original on September 25, 2018. Retrieved March 21, 2018.
  32. ^ Arfaeinia, Hossein; Ghaemi, Maryam; Jahantigh, Anis; Soleimani, Farshid; Hashemi, Hassan (June 12, 2023). "Secondhand and thirdhand smoke: a review on chemical contents, exposure routes, and protective strategies". Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 30 (32): 78017–78029. Bibcode:2023ESPR...3078017A. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-28128-1. PMC 10258487. PMID 37306877.
  33. ^ Arfaeinia, Hossein; Ghaemi, Maryam; Jahantigh, Anis; Soleimani, Farshid; Hashemi, Hassan (June 12, 2023). "Secondhand and thirdhand smoke: a review on chemical contents, exposure routes, and protective strategies". Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 30 (32): 78017–78029. Bibcode:2023ESPR...3078017A. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-28128-1. ISSN 1614-7499. PMC 10258487. PMID 37306877.
  34. ^ Health, CDC's Office on Smoking and (May 9, 2018). "Smoking and Tobacco Use; Fact Sheet; Secondhand Smoke". Smoking and Tobacco Use. Archived from the original on December 15, 2021. Retrieved January 14, 2019.
  35. ^ Fernández, E; Ballbè, M; Sureda, X; Fu, M; Saltó, E; Martínez-Sánchez, JM (December 2015). "Particulate Matter from Electronic Cigarettes and Conventional Cigarettes: a Systematic Review and Observational Study". Current Environmental Health Reports. 2 (4): 423–9. Bibcode:2015CEHR....2..423F. doi:10.1007/s40572-015-0072-x. PMID 26452675.
  36. ^ Vu, Tuan V.; Harrison, Roy M. (May 8, 2019). "Chemical and Physical Properties of Indoor Aerosols". In Harrison, R. M.; Hester, R. E. (eds.). Indoor Air Pollution. The Royal Society of Chemistry (published 2019). ISBN 978-1-78801-803-6.
  37. ^ Abdullahi, Karimatu L.; Delgado-Saborit, Juana Maria; Harrison, Roy M. (February 13, 2013). "Emissions and indoor concentrations of particulate matter and its specific chemical components from cooking: A review". Atmospheric Environment. 71: 260–294. Bibcode:2013AtmEn..71..260A. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.061. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  38. ^ Patel, Sameer; Sankhyan, Sumit; Boedicker, Erin K.; DeCarlo, Peter F.; Farmer, Delphine K.; Goldstein, Allen H.; Katz, Erin F.; Nazaroff, William W; Tian, Yilin; Vanhanen, Joonas; Vance, Marina E. (June 16, 2020). "Indoor Particulate Matter during HOMEChem: Concentrations, Size Distributions, and Exposures". Environmental Science & Technology. 54 (12): 7107–7116. Bibcode:2020EnST...54.7107P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c00740. ISSN 0013-936X. PMID 32391692. Archived from the original on April 28, 2023. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  39. ^ Thangavel, Prakash; Park, Duckshin; Lee, Young-Chul (June 19, 2022). "Recent Insights into Particulate Matter (PM2.5)-Mediated Toxicity in Humans: An Overview". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19 (12): 7511. doi:10.3390/ijerph19127511. ISSN 1660-4601. PMC 9223652. PMID 35742761.
  40. ^ You, Bo; Zhou, Wei; Li, Junyao; Li, Zhijie; Sun, Yele (November 4, 2022). "A review of indoor Gaseous organic compounds and human chemical Exposure: Insights from Real-time measurements". Environment International. 170: 107611. Bibcode:2022EnInt.17007611Y. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2022.107611. PMID 36335895.
  41. ^ Weschler, Charles J.; Carslaw, Nicola (March 6, 2018). "Indoor Chemistry". Environmental Science & Technology. 52 (5): 2419–2428. Bibcode:2018EnST...52.2419W. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b06387. ISSN 0013-936X. PMID 29402076. Archived from the original on November 15, 2023. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  42. ^ a b Carter, Toby J.; Poppendieck, Dustin G.; Shaw, David; Carslaw, Nicola (January 16, 2023). "A Modelling Study of Indoor Air Chemistry: The Surface Interactions of Ozone and Hydrogen Peroxide". Atmospheric Environment. 297: 119598. Bibcode:2023AtmEn.29719598C. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119598.
  43. ^ Tsai, Wen-Tien (March 26, 2019). "An overview of health hazards of volatile organic compounds regulated as indoor air pollutants". Reviews on Environmental Health. 34 (1): 81–89. doi:10.1515/reveh-2018-0046. PMID 30854833.
  44. ^ "U.S. EPA IAQ – Organic chemicals". Epa.gov. August 5, 2010. Archived from the original on September 9, 2015. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  45. ^ a b Davies, Helen L.; O'Leary, Catherine; Dillon, Terry; Shaw, David R.; Shaw, Marvin; Mehra, Archit; Phillips, Gavin; Carslaw, Nicola (August 14, 2023). "A measurement and modelling investigation of the indoor air chemistry following cooking activities". Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 25 (9): 1532–1548. doi:10.1039/D3EM00167A. ISSN 2050-7887. PMID 37609942.
  46. ^ a b c Harding-Smith, Ellen; Shaw, David R.; Shaw, Marvin; Dillon, Terry J.; Carslaw, Nicola (January 23, 2024). "Does green mean clean? Volatile organic emissions from regular versus green cleaning products". Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 26 (2): 436–450. doi:10.1039/D3EM00439B. ISSN 2050-7887. PMID 38258874.
  47. ^ Lebel, Eric D.; Michanowicz, Drew R.; Bilsback, Kelsey R.; Hill, Lee Ann L.; Goldman, Jackson S. W.; Domen, Jeremy K.; Jaeger, Jessie M.; Ruiz, Angélica; Shonkoff, Seth B. C. (November 15, 2022). "Composition, Emissions, and Air Quality Impacts of Hazardous Air Pollutants in Unburned Natural Gas from Residential Stoves in California". Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (22): 15828–15838. Bibcode:2022EnST...5615828L. doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c02581. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 9671046. PMID 36263944.
  48. ^ "Volatile Organic Compounds' Impact on Indoor Air Quality". United States Environmental Protection Agency. August 18, 2014. Retrieved May 23, 2024.
  49. ^ "About VOCs". January 21, 2013. Archived from the original on January 21, 2013. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
  50. ^ Oanh, Nguyen Thi Kim; Hung, Yung-Tse (2005). "Indoor Air Pollution Control". Advanced Air and Noise Pollution Control. Handbook of Environmental Engineering. Vol. 2. pp. 237–272. doi:10.1007/978-1-59259-779-6_7. ISBN 978-1-58829-359-6.
  51. ^ "Emicode". Eurofins.com. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  52. ^ "M1". Eurofins.com. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  53. ^ "Blue Angel". Eurofins.com. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  54. ^ "Indoor Air Comfort". Indoor Air Comfort. Archived from the original on February 1, 2011. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  55. ^ "CDPH Section 01350". Eurofins.com. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  56. ^ a b "Smelly Moldy Houses". Archived from the original on December 15, 2021. Retrieved August 2, 2014.
  57. ^ Meruva, N. K.; Penn, J. M.; Farthing, D. E. (November 2004). "Rapid identification of microbial VOCs from tobacco molds using closed-loop stripping and gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry". J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 31 (10): 482–8. doi:10.1007/s10295-004-0175-0. PMID 15517467. S2CID 32543591.
  58. ^ "Atmospheric carbon dioxide passes 400 ppm everywhere". Physics Today (6): 8170. 2016. Bibcode:2016PhT..2016f8170.. doi:10.1063/pt.5.029904.
  59. ^ Xie Y, Li Y, Feng Y, Cheng W, Wang Y (April 2022). "Inhalable microplastics prevails in air: Exploring the size detection limit". Environ Int. 162: 107151. Bibcode:2022EnInt.16207151X. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2022.107151. PMID 35228011.
  60. ^ Liu C, Li J, Zhang Y, Wang L, Deng J, Gao Y, Yu L, Zhang J, Sun H (July 2019). "Widespread distribution of PET and PC microplastics in dust in urban China and their estimated human exposure". Environ Int. 128: 116–124. Bibcode:2019EnInt.128..116L. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.024. PMID 31039519.
  61. ^ Yuk, Hyeonseong; Jo, Ho Hyeon; Nam, Jihee; Kim, Young Uk; Kim, Sumin (2022). "Microplastic: A particulate matter(PM) generated by deterioration of building materials". Journal of Hazardous Materials. 437. Elsevier BV: 129290. Bibcode:2022JHzM..43729290Y. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129290. ISSN 0304-3894. PMID 35753297.
  62. ^ Eberhard, Tiffany; Casillas, Gaston; Zarus, Gregory M.; Barr, Dana Boyd (January 6, 2024). "Systematic review of microplastics and nanoplastics in indoor and outdoor air: identifying a framework and data needs for quantifying human inhalation exposures" (PDF). Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 34 (2). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 185–196. doi:10.1038/s41370-023-00634-x. ISSN 1559-0631. Retrieved December 19, 2024. MPs have been found in water and soil, and recent research is exposing the vast amount of them in ambient and indoor air.
  63. ^ Gasperi, Johnny; Wright, Stephanie L.; Dris, Rachid; Collard, France; Mandin, Corinne; Guerrouache, Mohamed; Langlois, Valérie; Kelly, Frank J.; Tassin, Bruno (2018). "Microplastics in air: Are we breathing it in?" (PDF). Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health. 1: 1–5. Bibcode:2018COESH...1....1G. doi:10.1016/j.coesh.2017.10.002. S2CID 133750509. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 6, 2020. Retrieved July 11, 2019.
  64. ^ Prasittisopin, Lapyote; Ferdous, Wahid; Kamchoom, Viroon (2023). "Microplastics in construction and built environment". Developments in the Built Environment. 15. Elsevier BV. doi:10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100188. ISSN 2666-1659.
  65. ^ Galloway, Nanette LoBiondo (September 13, 2024). "Ventnor introduces ordinance to control microplastics contamination". DownBeach. Retrieved October 2, 2024.
  66. ^ Weschler, Charles J. (December 2000). "Ozone in Indoor Environments: Concentration and Chemistry: Ozone in Indoor Environments". Indoor Air. 10 (4): 269–288. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0668.2000.010004269.x. PMID 11089331. Archived from the original on April 15, 2024. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  67. ^ Weschler, Charles J.; Nazaroff, William W (February 22, 2023). "Human skin oil: a major ozone reactant indoors". Environmental Science: Atmospheres. 3 (4): 640–661. doi:10.1039/D3EA00008G. ISSN 2634-3606. Archived from the original on April 15, 2024. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  68. ^ Kumar, Prashant; Kalaiarasan, Gopinath; Porter, Alexandra E.; Pinna, Alessandra; KÅ‚osowski, MichaÅ‚ M.; Demokritou, Philip; Chung, Kian Fan; Pain, Christopher; Arvind, D. K.; Arcucci, Rossella; Adcock, Ian M.; Dilliway, Claire (February 20, 2021). "An overview of methods of fine and ultrafine particle collection for physicochemical characterisation and toxicity assessments". Science of the Total Environment. 756: 143553. Bibcode:2021ScTEn.75643553K. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143553. hdl:10044/1/84518. PMID 33239200. S2CID 227176222.
  69. ^ Apte, M. G.; Buchanan, I. S. H.; Mendell, M. J. (April 2008). "Outdoor ozone and building-related symptoms in the BASE study". Indoor Air. 18 (2): 156–170. Bibcode:2008InAir..18..156A. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2008.00521.x. PMID 18333994.
  70. ^ "Eight-hour Average Ozone Concentrations | Ground-level Ozone | New England | US EPA". United States Environmental Protection Agency. Archived from the original on December 15, 2021. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
  71. ^ a b c Park, J. H.; Cox-Ganser, J. M. (2011). "Meta-Mold exposure and respiratory health in damp indoor environments". Frontiers in Bioscience. 3 (2): 757–771. doi:10.2741/e284. PMID 21196349.
  72. ^ "CDC – Mold – General Information – Facts About Mold and Dampness". December 4, 2018. Archived from the original on December 16, 2019. Retrieved June 23, 2017.
  73. ^ Singh, Dr Jagjit; Singh, Jagjit, eds. (1994). Building Mycology (1 ed.). Taylor & Francis. doi:10.4324/9780203974735. ISBN 978-1-135-82462-4.
  74. ^ a b Clarke, J.A; Johnstone, C.M; Kelly, N.J; McLean, R.C; anderson, J.A; Rowan, N.J; Smith, J.E (January 20, 1999). "A technique for the prediction of the conditions leading to mould growth in buildings". Building and Environment. 34 (4): 515–521. Bibcode:1999BuEnv..34..515C. doi:10.1016/S0360-1323(98)00023-7. Archived from the original on October 26, 2022. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  75. ^ Vereecken, Evy; Roels, Staf (November 15, 2011). "Review of mould prediction models and their influence on mould risk evaluation". Building and Environment. 51: 296–310. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.003. Archived from the original on March 2, 2024. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  76. ^ BS 5250:2021 - Management of moisture in buildings. Code of practice. British Standards Institution (BSI). October 31, 2021. ISBN 978-0-539-18975-9.
  77. ^ Madgwick, Della; Wood, Hannah (August 8, 2016). "The problem of clothes drying in new homes in the UK". Structural Survey. 34 (4/5): 320–330. doi:10.1108/SS-10-2015-0048. ISSN 0263-080X. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  78. ^ May, Neil; McGilligan, Charles; Ucci, Marcella (2017). "Health and Moisture in Buildings" (PDF). UK Centre for Moisture in Buildings. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 11, 2024. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  79. ^ "Understanding and addressing the health risks of damp and mould in the home". GOV.UK. September 7, 2023. Archived from the original on April 10, 2024. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  80. ^ Clark, Sierra N.; Lam, Holly C. Y.; Goode, Emma-Jane; Marczylo, Emma L.; Exley, Karen S.; Dimitroulopoulou, Sani (August 2, 2023). "The Burden of Respiratory Disease from Formaldehyde, Damp and Mould in English Housing". Environments. 10 (8): 136. doi:10.3390/environments10080136. ISSN 2076-3298.
  81. ^ Microbiology of the Indoor Environment Archived July 23, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, microbe.net
  82. ^ http://www.info.gov.hk/info/sars/pdf/amoy_e.pdf
  83. ^ https://www.info.gov.hk/info/sars/graphics/amoyannex.jpg
  84. ^ "Progress in Global Surveillance and Response Capacity 10 Years after Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome". environmental contamination with SARS CoV RNA was identified on the carpet in front of the index case-patient's room and 3 nearby rooms (and on their door frames but not inside the rooms) and in the air intake vents near the centrally located elevators ... secondary infections occurred not in guest rooms but in the common areas of the ninth floor, such as the corridor or elevator hall. These areas could have been contaminated through body fluids (e.g., vomitus, expectorated sputum), respiratory droplets, or suspended small-particle aerosols generated by the index case-patient; other guests were then infected by fomites or aerosols while passing through these same areas. Efficient spread of SARS CoV through small-particle aerosols was observed in several superspreading events in health care settings, during an airplane flight, and in an apartment complex (12–14,16–19). This process of environmental contamination that generated infectious aerosols likely best explains the pattern of disease transmission at the Hotel Metropole.
  85. ^ Azuma, Kenichi; Kagi, Naoki; Yanagi, U.; Osawa, Haruki (December 2018). "Effects of low-level inhalation exposure to carbon dioxide in indoor environments: A short review on human health and psychomotor performance". Environment International. 121 (Pt 1): 51–56. Bibcode:2018EnInt.121...51A. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.08.059. PMID 30172928.
  86. ^ Du, Bowen; Tandoc, Michael (June 19, 2020). "Indoor CO2 concentrations and cognitive function: A critical review". International Journal of Indoor Environment and Health. 30 (6): 1067–1082. Bibcode:2020InAir..30.1067D. doi:10.1111/ina.12706. PMID 32557862. S2CID 219915861.
  87. ^ Fan, Yuejie; Cao, Xiaodong; Zhang, Jie; Lai, Dayi; Pang, Liping (June 1, 2023). "Short-term exposure to indoor carbon dioxide and cognitive task performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis". Building and Environment. 237: 110331. Bibcode:2023BuEnv.23710331F. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110331.
  88. ^ a b Lowther, Scott D.; Dimitroulopoulou, Sani; Foxall, Kerry; Shrubsole, Clive; Cheek, Emily; Gadeberg, Britta; Sepai, Ovnair (November 16, 2021). "Low Level Carbon Dioxide Indoors—A Pollution Indicator or a Pollutant? A Health-Based Perspective". Environments. 8 (11): 125. doi:10.3390/environments8110125. ISSN 2076-3298.
  89. ^ Persily, Andrew (July 2022). "Development and application of an indoor carbon dioxide metric". Indoor Air. 32 (7): e13059. doi:10.1111/ina.13059. PMID 35904382.
  90. ^ "Indoor Environmental Quality: HVAC Management | NIOSH | CDC". www.cdc.gov. February 25, 2022. Archived from the original on April 1, 2022. Retrieved April 1, 2022.
  91. ^ Indoor Environmental Quality: Building Ventilation Archived January 20, 2022, at the Wayback Machine. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Accessed October 8, 2008.
  92. ^ "SAMHE - Schools' Air quality Monitoring for Health and Education". samhe.org.uk. Archived from the original on March 18, 2024. Retrieved March 18, 2024.
  93. ^ "Document Display | NEPIS | US EPA". nepis.epa.gov. Archived from the original on November 16, 2023. Retrieved October 19, 2023.
  94. ^ Zeeb & Shannoun 2009, p. 3.
  95. ^ C.Michael Hogan and Sjaak Slanina. 2010, Air pollution. Encyclopedia of Earth Archived October 12, 2006, at the Wayback Machine. eds. Sidney Draggan and Cutler Cleveland. National Council for Science and the Environment. Washington DC
  96. ^ "Radon Mitigation Methods". Radon Solution—Raising Radon Awareness. Archived from the original on December 15, 2008. Retrieved December 2, 2008.
  97. ^ Zeeb & Shannoun 2009, p. [page needed].
  98. ^ "Basic radon facts" (PDF). US Environmental Protection Agency. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 13, 2022. Retrieved September 18, 2018. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  99. ^ "Radon Action Level and Target Level". UKradon. Archived from the original on March 18, 2024. Retrieved March 18, 2024.
  100. ^ "Radon Zone Map (with State Information)". U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Archived from the original on April 1, 2023. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  101. ^ "UK maps of radon". UKradon. Archived from the original on March 7, 2024. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  102. ^ "Radon map of Australia". Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA). Archived from the original on March 20, 2024. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  103. ^ "Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis". Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 26, 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  104. ^ Chen, Guochao; Qiu, Minghao; Wang, Peng; Zhang, Yuqiang; Shindell, Drew; Zhang, Hongliang (July 19, 2024). "Continuous wildfires threaten public and ecosystem health under climate change across continents". Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering. 18 (10). doi:10.1007/s11783-024-1890-6. ISSN 2095-2201.
  105. ^ Gherasim, Alina; Lee, Alison G.; Bernstein, Jonathan A. (November 14, 2023). "Impact of Climate Change on Indoor Air Quality". Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America. 44 (1): 55–73. doi:10.1016/j.iac.2023.09.001. PMID 37973260. Archived from the original on November 15, 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  106. ^ Lacressonnière, Gwendoline; Watson, Laura; Gauss, Michael; Engardt, Magnuz; Andersson, Camilla; Beekmann, Matthias; Colette, Augustin; Foret, Gilles; Josse, Béatrice; Marécal, Virginie; Nyiri, Agnes; Siour, Guillaume; Sobolowski, Stefan; Vautard, Robert (February 1, 2017). "Particulate matter air pollution in Europe in a +2 °C warming world". Atmospheric Environment. 154: 129–140. Bibcode:2017AtmEn.154..129L. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.037. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  107. ^ Lee, J; Lewis, A; Monks, P; Jacob, M; Hamilton, J; Hopkins, J; Watson, N; Saxton, J; Ennis, C; Carpenter, L (September 26, 2006). "Ozone photochemistry and elevated isoprene during the UK heatwave of august 2003". Atmospheric Environment. 40 (39): 7598–7613. Bibcode:2006AtmEn..40.7598L. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.057. Archived from the original on October 26, 2022. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  108. ^ Salthammer, Tunga; Schieweck, Alexandra; Gu, Jianwei; Ameri, Shaghayegh; Uhde, Erik (August 7, 2018). "Future trends in ambient air pollution and climate in Germany – Implications for the indoor environment". Building and Environment. 143: 661–670. Bibcode:2018BuEnv.143..661S. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.07.050.
  109. ^ Zhong, L.; Lee, C.-S.; Haghighat, F. (December 1, 2016). "Indoor ozone and climate change". Sustainable Cities and Society. 28: 466–472. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2016.08.020. Archived from the original on November 28, 2022. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  110. ^ Zhao, Jiangyue; Uhde, Erik; Salthammer, Tunga; Antretter, Florian; Shaw, David; Carslaw, Nicola; Schieweck, Alexandra (December 9, 2023). "Long-term prediction of the effects of climate change on indoor climate and air quality". Environmental Research. 243: 117804. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2023.117804. PMID 38042519.
  111. ^ Niculita-Hirzel, Hélène (March 16, 2022). "Latest Trends in Pollutant Accumulations at Threatening Levels in Energy-Efficient Residential Buildings with and without Mechanical Ventilation: A Review". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19 (6): 3538. doi:10.3390/ijerph19063538. ISSN 1660-4601. PMC 8951331. PMID 35329223.
  112. ^ UK Health Security Agency (2024) [1 September 2012]. "Chapter 5: Impact of climate change policies on indoor environmental quality and health in UK housing". Health Effects of Climate Change (HECC) in the UK: 2023 report (published January 15, 2024).
  113. ^ World Health Organization, ed. (2010). Who guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants. Copenhagen: WHO. ISBN 978-92-890-0213-4. OCLC 696099951.
  114. ^ "Air quality: UK guidelines for volatile organic compounds in indoor spaces". Public Health England. September 13, 2019. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
  115. ^ "Home - IEQ Guidelines". ieqguidelines.org. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
  116. ^ Toyinbo, Oluyemi; Hägerhed, Linda; Dimitroulopoulou, Sani; Dudzinska, Marzenna; Emmerich, Steven; Hemming, David; Park, Ju-Hyeong; Haverinen-Shaughnessy, Ulla; the Scientific Technical Committee 34 of the International Society of Indoor Air Quality, Climate (April 19, 2022). "Open database for international and national indoor environmental quality guidelines". Indoor Air. 32 (4): e13028. doi:10.1111/ina.13028. ISSN 0905-6947. PMC 11099937. PMID 35481936.cite journal: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  117. ^ Dimitroulopoulou, Sani; DudziÅ„ska, Marzenna R.; Gunnarsen, Lars; Hägerhed, Linda; Maula, Henna; Singh, Raja; Toyinbo, Oluyemi; Haverinen-Shaughnessy, Ulla (August 4, 2023). "Indoor air quality guidelines from across the world: An appraisal considering energy saving, health, productivity, and comfort". Environment International. 178: 108127. Bibcode:2023EnInt.17808127D. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2023.108127. PMID 37544267.
  118. ^ Pitarma, Rui; Marques, Gonçalo; Ferreira, Bárbara Roque (February 2017). "Monitoring Indoor Air Quality for Enhanced Occupational Health". Journal of Medical Systems. 41 (2): 23. doi:10.1007/s10916-016-0667-2. PMID 28000117. S2CID 7372403.
  119. ^ Wyon, D. P. (August 2004). "The effects of indoor air quality on performance and productivity: The effects of IAQ on performance and productivity". Indoor Air. 14: 92–101. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00278.x. PMID 15330777.
  120. ^ Son, Young Joo; Pope, Zachary C.; Pantelic, Jovan (September 2023). "Perceived air quality and satisfaction during implementation of an automated indoor air quality monitoring and control system". Building and Environment. 243: 110713. Bibcode:2023BuEnv.24310713S. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110713.
  121. ^ IAQM (2021). Indoor Air Quality Guidance: Assessment, Monitoring, Modelling and Mitigation (PDF) (Version 0.1 ed.). London: Institute of Air Quality Management.
  122. ^ a b Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance. "Indoor workplaces – Recommended procedure for the investigation of working environment". Archived from the original on November 3, 2021. Retrieved June 10, 2020.
  123. ^ "Climate Change: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide | NOAA Climate.gov". www.climate.gov. April 9, 2024. Retrieved May 6, 2024.
  124. ^ "Ventilation to reduce the spread of respiratory infections, including COVID-19". GOV.UK. August 2, 2022. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  125. ^ Dela Cruz, Majbrit; Christensen, Jan H.; Thomsen, Jane Dyrhauge; Müller, Renate (December 2014). "Can ornamental potted plants remove volatile organic compounds from indoor air? — a review". Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 21 (24): 13909–13928. Bibcode:2014ESPR...2113909D. doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3240-x. PMID 25056742. S2CID 207272189.
  126. ^ Cummings, Bryan E.; Waring, Michael S. (March 2020). "Potted plants do not improve indoor air quality: a review and analysis of reported VOC removal efficiencies". Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 30 (2): 253–261. Bibcode:2020JESEE..30..253C. doi:10.1038/s41370-019-0175-9. PMID 31695112. S2CID 207911697.
  127. ^ Wolverton, B. C.; Wolverton, J. D. (1996). "Interior plants: their influence on airborne microbes inside energy-efficient buildings". Journal of the Mississippi Academy of Sciences. 41 (2): 100–105.
  128. ^ US EPA, OAR (July 16, 2013). "Mold". US EPA. Archived from the original on May 18, 2020. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
  129. ^ Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Damp Indoor Spaces and Health (2004). Damp Indoor Spaces and Health. National Academies Press. ISBN 978-0-309-09193-0. PMID 25009878. Archived from the original on January 19, 2023. Retrieved March 30, 2024.[page needed]
  130. ^ "Indoor Environmental Quality". Washington, DC: US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved May 17, 2013.
  131. ^ Lewis, Alastair C; Allan, James; Carslaw, David; Carruthers, David; Fuller, Gary; Harrison, Roy; Heal, Mathew; Nemitz, Eiko; Reeves, Claire (2022). Indoor Air Quality (PDF) (Report). Air Quality Expert Group. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6523605. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 5, 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  132. ^ "Isiaq.Org". International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate. Archived from the original on January 21, 2022. Retrieved March 2, 2012.

Sources

[edit]
Monographs
  • May, Jeffrey C.; Connie L. May; Ouellette, John J.; Reed, Charles E. (2004). The mold survival guide for your home and for your health. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-7938-8.
  • May, Jeffrey C. (2001). My house is killing me! : the home guide for families with allergies and asthma. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-6730-9.
  • May, Jeffrey C. (2006). My office is killing me! : the sick building survival guide. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-8342-2.
  • Salthammer, T., ed. (1999). Organic Indoor Air Pollutants — Occurrence, Measurement, Evaluation. Wiley-VCH. ISBN 978-3-527-29622-4.
  • Spengler, J.D.; Samet, J.M. (1991). Indoor air pollution: A health perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-4125-5.
  • Samet, J.M.; McCarthy, J.F. (2001). Indoor Air Quality Handbook. NY: McGraw–Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-445549-4.
  • Tichenor, B. (1996). Characterizing Sources of Indoor Air Pollution and Related Sink Effects. ASTM STP 1287. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM. ISBN 978-0-8031-2030-3.
  • Zeeb, Hajo; Shannoun, Ferid, eds. (2009). WHO Handbook on Indoor Radon: A Public Health Perspective. World Health Organization. ISBN 978-92-4-154767-3. PMID 23762967. NBK143216. Archived from the original on March 30, 2024. Retrieved March 30, 2024.
Articles, radio segments, web pages
  • Apte, M. G.; Buchanan, I. S. H.; Mendell, M. J. (April 2008). "Outdoor ozone and building-related symptoms in the BASE study". Indoor Air. 18 (2): 156–170. Bibcode:2008InAir..18..156A. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2008.00521.x. PMID 18333994.
  • Bad In-Flight Air Exacerbated by Passengers Archived December 15, 2021, at the Wayback Machine, Talk of the Nation, National Public Radio, September 21, 2007.
  • Indoor Air Pollution index page, United States Environmental Protection Agency.
  • Steinemann, Anne (2017). "Ten questions concerning air fresheners and indoor built environments". Building and Environment. 111: 279–284. Bibcode:2017BuEnv.111..279S. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.009. hdl:11343/121890.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Lin, Y.; Zou, J.; Yang, W.; Li, C. Q. (2018). "A Review of Recent Advances in Research on PM2.5 in China". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 15 (3): 438. doi:10.3390/ijerph15030438. PMC 5876983. PMID 29498704.
  • Abdel Hameed, A. A.; Yasser, I. H.; Khoder, I. M. (2004). "Indoor air quality during renovation actions: a case study". Journal of Environmental Monitoring. 6 (9): 740–744. doi:10.1039/b402995j. PMID 15346177.
[edit]
  • US Environmental Protection Agency info on IAQ
  • Best Practices for Indoor Air Quality when Remodeling Your Home, US EPA
  • Addressing Indoor Environmental Concerns During Remodeling, US EPA
  • Renovation and Repair, Part of Indoor Air Quality Design Tools for Schools, US EPA
  • The 9 Foundations of a Healthy Building, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health

 

A thermal image of human

Thermal comfort is the condition of mind that expresses subjective satisfaction with the thermal environment.[1] The human body can be viewed as a heat engine where food is the input energy. The human body will release excess heat into the environment, so the body can continue to operate. The heat transfer is proportional to temperature difference. In cold environments, the body loses more heat to the environment and in hot environments the body does not release enough heat. Both the hot and cold scenarios lead to discomfort.[2] Maintaining this standard of thermal comfort for occupants of buildings or other enclosures is one of the important goals of HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) design engineers.

Thermal neutrality is maintained when the heat generated by human metabolism is allowed to dissipate, thus maintaining thermal equilibrium with the surroundings. The main factors that influence thermal neutrality are those that determine heat gain and loss, namely metabolic rate, clothing insulation, air temperature, mean radiant temperature, air speed and relative humidity. Psychological parameters, such as individual expectations, and physiological parameters also affect thermal neutrality.[3] Neutral temperature is the temperature that can lead to thermal neutrality and it may vary greatly between individuals and depending on factors such as activity level, clothing, and humidity. People are highly sensitive to even small differences in environmental temperature. At 24 °C, a difference of 0.38 °C can be detected between the temperature of two rooms.[4]

The Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) model stands among the most recognized thermal comfort models. It was developed using principles of heat balance and experimental data collected in a controlled climate chamber under steady state conditions.[5] The adaptive model, on the other hand, was developed based on hundreds of field studies with the idea that occupants dynamically interact with their environment. Occupants control their thermal environment by means of clothing, operable windows, fans, personal heaters, and sun shades.[3][6] The PMV model can be applied to air-conditioned buildings, while the adaptive model can be applied only to buildings where no mechanical systems have been installed.[1] There is no consensus about which comfort model should be applied for buildings that are partially air-conditioned spatially or temporally.

Thermal comfort calculations in accordance with the ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55,[1] the ISO 7730 Standard[7] and the EN 16798-1 Standard[8] can be freely performed with either the CBE Thermal Comfort Tool for ASHRAE 55,[9] with the Python package pythermalcomfort[10] or with the R package comf.

Significance

[edit]

Satisfaction with the thermal environment is important because thermal conditions are potentially life-threatening for humans if the core body temperature reaches conditions of hyperthermia, above 37.5–38.3 °C (99.5–100.9 °F),[11][12] or hypothermia, below 35.0 °C (95.0 °F).[13] Buildings modify the conditions of the external environment and reduce the effort that the human body needs to do in order to stay stable at a normal human body temperature, important for the correct functioning of human physiological processes.

The Roman writer Vitruvius actually linked this purpose to the birth of architecture.[14] David Linden also suggests that the reason why we associate tropical beaches with paradise is because in those environments is where human bodies need to do less metabolic effort to maintain their core temperature.[15] Temperature not only supports human life; coolness and warmth have also become in different cultures a symbol of protection, community and even the sacred.[16]

In building science studies, thermal comfort has been related to productivity and health. Office workers who are satisfied with their thermal environment are more productive.[17][18] The combination of high temperature and high relative humidity reduces thermal comfort and indoor air quality.[19]

Although a single static temperature can be comfortable, people are attracted by thermal changes, such as campfires and cool pools. Thermal pleasure is caused by varying thermal sensations from a state of unpleasantness to a state of pleasantness, and the scientific term for it is positive thermal alliesthesia.[20] From a state of thermal neutrality or comfort any change will be perceived as unpleasant.[21] This challenges the assumption that mechanically controlled buildings should deliver uniform temperatures and comfort, if it is at the cost of excluding thermal pleasure.[22]

Influencing factors

[edit]

Since there are large variations from person to person in terms of physiological and psychological satisfaction, it is hard to find an optimal temperature for everyone in a given space. Laboratory and field data have been collected to define conditions that will be found comfortable for a specified percentage of occupants.[1]

There are numerous factors that directly affect thermal comfort that can be grouped in two categories:

  1. Personal factors – characteristics of the occupants such as metabolic rate and clothing level
  2. Environmental factors – which are conditions of the thermal environment, specifically air temperature, mean radiant temperature, air speed and humidity

Even if all these factors may vary with time, standards usually refer to a steady state to study thermal comfort, just allowing limited temperature variations.

Personal factors

[edit]

Metabolic rate

[edit]

People have different metabolic rates that can fluctuate due to activity level and environmental conditions.[23][24][25] ASHRAE 55-2017 defines metabolic rate as the rate of transformation of chemical energy into heat and mechanical work by metabolic activities of an individual, per unit of skin surface area.[1]: 3 

Metabolic rate is expressed in units of met, equal to 58.2 W/m² (18.4 Btu/h·ft²). One met is equal to the energy produced per unit surface area of an average person seated at rest.

ASHRAE 55 provides a table of metabolic rates for a variety of activities. Some common values are 0.7 met for sleeping, 1.0 met for a seated and quiet position, 1.2–1.4 met for light activities standing, 2.0 met or more for activities that involve movement, walking, lifting heavy loads or operating machinery. For intermittent activity, the standard states that it is permissible to use a time-weighted average metabolic rate if individuals are performing activities that vary over a period of one hour or less. For longer periods, different metabolic rates must be considered.[1]

According to ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals, estimating metabolic rates is complex, and for levels above 2 or 3 met – especially if there are various ways of performing such activities – the accuracy is low. Therefore, the standard is not applicable for activities with an average level higher than 2 met. Met values can also be determined more accurately than the tabulated ones, using an empirical equation that takes into account the rate of respiratory oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production. Another physiological yet less accurate method is related to the heart rate, since there is a relationship between the latter and oxygen consumption.[26]

The Compendium of Physical Activities is used by physicians to record physical activities. It has a different definition of met that is the ratio of the metabolic rate of the activity in question to a resting metabolic rate.[27] As the formulation of the concept is different from the one that ASHRAE uses, these met values cannot be used directly in PMV calculations, but it opens up a new way of quantifying physical activities.

Food and drink habits may have an influence on metabolic rates, which indirectly influences thermal preferences. These effects may change depending on food and drink intake.[28]

Body shape is another factor that affects metabolic rate and hence thermal comfort. Heat dissipation depends on body surface area. The surface area of an average person is 1.8 m2 (19 ft2).[1] A tall and skinny person has a larger surface-to-volume ratio, can dissipate heat more easily, and can tolerate higher temperatures more than a person with a rounded body shape.[28]

Clothing insulation

[edit]

The amount of thermal insulation worn by a person has a substantial impact on thermal comfort, because it influences the heat loss and consequently the thermal balance. Layers of insulating clothing prevent heat loss and can either help keep a person warm or lead to overheating. Generally, the thicker the garment is, the greater insulating ability it has. Depending on the type of material the clothing is made out of, air movement and relative humidity can decrease the insulating ability of the material.[29][30]

1 clo is equal to 0.155 m2·K/W (0.88 °F·ft2·h/Btu). This corresponds to trousers, a long sleeved shirt, and a jacket. Clothing insulation values for other common ensembles or single garments can be found in ASHRAE 55.[1]

Skin wetness
[edit]

Skin wetness is defined as "the proportion of the total skin surface area of the body covered with sweat".[31] The wetness of skin in different areas also affects perceived thermal comfort. Humidity can increase wetness in different areas of the body, leading to a perception of discomfort. This is usually localized in different parts of the body, and local thermal comfort limits for skin wetness differ by locations of the body.[32] The extremities are much more sensitive to thermal discomfort from wetness than the trunk of the body. Although local thermal discomfort can be caused by wetness, the thermal comfort of the whole body will not be affected by the wetness of certain parts.

Environmental factors

[edit]

Air temperature

[edit]

The air temperature is the average temperature of the air surrounding the occupant, with respect to location and time. According to ASHRAE 55 standard, the spatial average takes into account the ankle, waist and head levels, which vary for seated or standing occupants. The temporal average is based on three-minutes intervals with at least 18 equally spaced points in time. Air temperature is measured with a dry-bulb thermometer and for this reason it is also known as dry-bulb temperature.

Mean radiant temperature

[edit]

The radiant temperature is related to the amount of radiant heat transferred from a surface, and it depends on the material's ability to absorb or emit heat, or its emissivity. The mean radiant temperature depends on the temperatures and emissivities of the surrounding surfaces as well as the view factor, or the amount of the surface that is “seen” by the object. So the mean radiant temperature experienced by a person in a room with the sunlight streaming in varies based on how much of their body is in the sun.

Air speed

[edit]

Air speed is defined as the rate of air movement at a point, without regard to direction. According to ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55, it is the average speed of the air surrounding a representative occupant, with respect to location and time. The spatial average is for three heights as defined for average air temperature. For an occupant moving in a space the sensors shall follow the movements of the occupant. The air speed is averaged over an interval not less than one and not greater than three minutes. Variations that occur over a period greater than three minutes shall be treated as multiple different air speeds.[33]

Relative humidity

[edit]

Relative humidity (RH) is the ratio of the amount of water vapor in the air to the amount of water vapor that the air could hold at the specific temperature and pressure. While the human body has thermoreceptors in the skin that enable perception of temperature, relative humidity is detected indirectly. Sweating is an effective heat loss mechanism that relies on evaporation from the skin. However at high RH, the air has close to the maximum water vapor that it can hold, so evaporation, and therefore heat loss, is decreased. On the other hand, very dry environments (RH < 20–30%) are also uncomfortable because of their effect on the mucous membranes. The recommended level of indoor humidity is in the range of 30–60% in air conditioned buildings,[34][35] but new standards such as the adaptive model allow lower and higher humidity, depending on the other factors involved in thermal comfort.

Recently, the effects of low relative humidity and high air velocity were tested on humans after bathing. Researchers found that low relative humidity engendered thermal discomfort as well as the sensation of dryness and itching. It is recommended to keep relative humidity levels higher in a bathroom than other rooms in the house for optimal conditions.[36]

Various types of apparent temperature have been developed to combine air temperature and air humidity. For higher temperatures, there are quantitative scales, such as the heat index. For lower temperatures, a related interplay was identified only qualitatively:

  • High humidity and low temperatures cause the air to feel chilly.[37]
  • Cold air with high relative humidity "feels" colder than dry air of the same temperature because high humidity in cold weather increases the conduction of heat from the body.[38]

There has been controversy over why damp cold air feels colder than dry cold air. Some believe it is because when the humidity is high, our skin and clothing become moist and are better conductors of heat, so there is more cooling by conduction.[39]

The influence of humidity can be exacerbated with the combined use of fans (forced convection cooling).[40]

Natural ventilation

[edit]

Many buildings use an HVAC unit to control their thermal environment. Other buildings are naturally ventilated (or would have cross ventilation) and do not rely on mechanical systems to provide thermal comfort. Depending on the climate, this can drastically reduce energy consumption. It is sometimes seen as a risk, though, since indoor temperatures can be too extreme if the building is poorly designed. Properly designed, naturally ventilated buildings keep indoor conditions within the range where opening windows and using fans in the summer, and wearing extra clothing in the winter, can keep people thermally comfortable.[41]

Models and indices

[edit]

There are several different models or indices that can be used to assess thermal comfort conditions indoors as described below.

PMV/PPD method

[edit]
Psychrometric Chart
Temperature-relative humidity chart
Two alternative representations of thermal comfort for the PMV/PPD method

The PMV/PPD model was developed by P.O. Fanger using heat-balance equations and empirical studies about skin temperature to define comfort. Standard thermal comfort surveys ask subjects about their thermal sensation on a seven-point scale from cold (−3) to hot (+3). Fanger's equations are used to calculate the predicted mean vote (PMV) of a group of subjects for a particular combination of air temperature, mean radiant temperature, relative humidity, air speed, metabolic rate, and clothing insulation.[5] PMV equal to zero is representing thermal neutrality, and the comfort zone is defined by the combinations of the six parameters for which the PMV is within the recommended limits (−0.5 < PMV < +0.5).[1] Although predicting the thermal sensation of a population is an important step in determining what conditions are comfortable, it is more useful to consider whether or not people will be satisfied. Fanger developed another equation to relate the PMV to the Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied (PPD). This relation was based on studies that surveyed subjects in a chamber where the indoor conditions could be precisely controlled.[5]

The PMV/PPD model is applied globally but does not directly take into account the adaptation mechanisms and outdoor thermal conditions.[3][42][43]

ASHRAE Standard 55-2017 uses the PMV model to set the requirements for indoor thermal conditions. It requires that at least 80% of the occupants be satisfied.[1]

The CBE Thermal Comfort Tool for ASHRAE 55[9] allows users to input the six comfort parameters to determine whether a certain combination complies with ASHRAE 55. The results are displayed on a psychrometric or a temperature-relative humidity chart and indicate the ranges of temperature and relative humidity that will be comfortable with the given the values input for the remaining four parameters.[44]

The PMV/PPD model has a low prediction accuracy.[45] Using the world largest thermal comfort field survey database,[46] the accuracy of PMV in predicting occupant's thermal sensation was only 34%, meaning that the thermal sensation is correctly predicted one out of three times. The PPD was overestimating subject's thermal unacceptability outside the thermal neutrality ranges (-1≤PMV≤1). The PMV/PPD accuracy varies strongly between ventilation strategies, building types and climates.[45]

Elevated air speed method

[edit]

ASHRAE 55 2013 accounts for air speeds above 0.2 metres per second (0.66 ft/s) separately than the baseline model. Because air movement can provide direct cooling to people, particularly if they are not wearing much clothing, higher temperatures can be more comfortable than the PMV model predicts. Air speeds up to 0.8 m/s (2.6 ft/s) are allowed without local control, and 1.2 m/s is possible with local control. This elevated air movement increases the maximum temperature for an office space in the summer to 30 °C from 27.5 °C (86.0–81.5 °F).[1]

Virtual Energy for Thermal Comfort

[edit]

"Virtual Energy for Thermal Comfort" is the amount of energy that will be required to make a non-air-conditioned building relatively as comfortable as one with air-conditioning. This is based on the assumption that the home will eventually install air-conditioning or heating.[47] Passive design improves thermal comfort in a building, thus reducing demand for heating or cooling. In many developing countries, however, most occupants do not currently heat or cool, due to economic constraints, as well as climate conditions which border lines comfort conditions such as cold winter nights in Johannesburg (South Africa) or warm summer days in San Jose, Costa Rica. At the same time, as incomes rise, there is a strong tendency to introduce cooling and heating systems. If we recognize and reward passive design features that improve thermal comfort today, we diminish the risk of having to install HVAC systems in the future, or we at least ensure that such systems will be smaller and less frequently used. Or in case the heating or cooling system is not installed due to high cost, at least people should not suffer from discomfort indoors. To provide an example, in San Jose, Costa Rica, if a house were being designed with high level of glazing and small opening sizes, the internal temperature would easily rise above 30 °C (86 °F) and natural ventilation would not be enough to remove the internal heat gains and solar gains. This is why Virtual Energy for Comfort is important.

World Bank's assessment tool the EDGE software (Excellence in Design for Greater Efficiencies) illustrates the potential issues with discomfort in buildings and has created the concept of Virtual Energy for Comfort which provides for a way to present potential thermal discomfort. This approach is used to award for design solutions which improves thermal comfort even in a fully free running building. Despite the inclusion of requirements for overheating in CIBSE, overcooling has not been assessed. However, overcooling can be an issue, mainly in the developing world, for example in cities such as Lima (Peru), Bogota, and Delhi, where cooler indoor temperatures can occur frequently. This may be a new area for research and design guidance for reduction of discomfort.

Cooling Effect

[edit]

ASHRAE 55-2017 defines the Cooling Effect (CE) at elevated air speed (above 0.2 metres per second (0.66 ft/s)) as the value that, when subtracted from both the air temperature and the mean radiant temperature, yields the same SET value under still air (0.1 m/s) as in the first SET calculation under elevated air speed.[1]

The CE can be used to determine the PMV adjusted for an environment with elevated air speed using the adjusted temperature, the adjusted radiant temperature and still air (0.2 metres per second (0.66 ft/s)). Where the adjusted temperatures are equal to the original air and mean radiant temperatures minus the CE.

Local thermal discomfort

[edit]

Avoiding local thermal discomfort, whether caused by a vertical air temperature difference between the feet and the head, by an asymmetric radiant field, by local convective cooling (draft), or by contact with a hot or cold floor, is essential to providing acceptable thermal comfort. People are generally more sensitive to local discomfort when their thermal sensation is cooler than neutral, while they are less sensitive to it when their body is warmer than neutral.[33]

Radiant temperature asymmetry

[edit]

Large differences in the thermal radiation of the surfaces surrounding a person may cause local discomfort or reduce acceptance of the thermal conditions. ASHRAE Standard 55 sets limits on the allowable temperature differences between various surfaces. Because people are more sensitive to some asymmetries than others, for example that of a warm ceiling versus that of hot and cold vertical surfaces, the limits depend on which surfaces are involved. The ceiling is not allowed to be more than +5 °C (9.0 °F) warmer, whereas a wall may be up to +23 °C (41 °F) warmer than the other surfaces.[1]

Draft

[edit]

While air movement can be pleasant and provide comfort in some circumstances, it is sometimes unwanted and causes discomfort. This unwanted air movement is called "draft" and is most prevalent when the thermal sensation of the whole body is cool. People are most likely to feel a draft on uncovered body parts such as their head, neck, shoulders, ankles, feet, and legs, but the sensation also depends on the air speed, air temperature, activity, and clothing.[1]

Floor surface temperature

[edit]

Floors that are too warm or too cool may cause discomfort, depending on footwear. ASHRAE 55 recommends that floor temperatures stay in the range of 19–29 °C (66–84 °F) in spaces where occupants will be wearing lightweight shoes.[1]

Standard effective temperature

[edit]

Standard effective temperature (SET) is a model of human response to the thermal environment. Developed by A.P. Gagge and accepted by ASHRAE in 1986,[48] it is also referred to as the Pierce Two-Node model.[49] Its calculation is similar to PMV because it is a comprehensive comfort index based on heat-balance equations that incorporates the personal factors of clothing and metabolic rate. Its fundamental difference is it takes a two-node method to represent human physiology in measuring skin temperature and skin wettedness.[48]

The SET index is defined as the equivalent dry bulb temperature of an isothermal environment at 50% relative humidity in which a subject, while wearing clothing standardized for activity concerned, would have the same heat stress (skin temperature) and thermoregulatory strain (skin wettedness) as in the actual test environment.[48]

Research has tested the model against experimental data and found it tends to overestimate skin temperature and underestimate skin wettedness.[49][50] Fountain and Huizenga (1997) developed a thermal sensation prediction tool that computes SET.[51] The SET index can also be calculated using either the CBE Thermal Comfort Tool for ASHRAE 55,[9] the Python package pythermalcomfort,[10] or the R package comf.

Adaptive comfort model

[edit]
Adaptive chart according to ASHRAE Standard 55-2010

The adaptive model is based on the idea that outdoor climate might be used as a proxy of indoor comfort because of a statistically significant correlation between them. The adaptive hypothesis predicts that contextual factors, such as having access to environmental controls, and past thermal history can influence building occupants' thermal expectations and preferences.[3] Numerous researchers have conducted field studies worldwide in which they survey building occupants about their thermal comfort while taking simultaneous environmental measurements. Analyzing a database of results from 160 of these buildings revealed that occupants of naturally ventilated buildings accept and even prefer a wider range of temperatures than their counterparts in sealed, air-conditioned buildings because their preferred temperature depends on outdoor conditions.[3] These results were incorporated in the ASHRAE 55-2004 standard as the adaptive comfort model. The adaptive chart relates indoor comfort temperature to prevailing outdoor temperature and defines zones of 80% and 90% satisfaction.[1]

The ASHRAE-55 2010 Standard introduced the prevailing mean outdoor temperature as the input variable for the adaptive model. It is based on the arithmetic average of the mean daily outdoor temperatures over no fewer than 7 and no more than 30 sequential days prior to the day in question.[1] It can also be calculated by weighting the temperatures with different coefficients, assigning increasing importance to the most recent temperatures. In case this weighting is used, there is no need to respect the upper limit for the subsequent days. In order to apply the adaptive model, there should be no mechanical cooling system for the space, occupants should be engaged in sedentary activities with metabolic rates of 1–1.3 met, and a prevailing mean temperature of 10–33.5 °C (50.0–92.3 °F).[1]

This model applies especially to occupant-controlled, natural-conditioned spaces, where the outdoor climate can actually affect the indoor conditions and so the comfort zone. In fact, studies by de Dear and Brager showed that occupants in naturally ventilated buildings were tolerant of a wider range of temperatures.[3] This is due to both behavioral and physiological adjustments, since there are different types of adaptive processes.[52] ASHRAE Standard 55-2010 states that differences in recent thermal experiences, changes in clothing, availability of control options, and shifts in occupant expectations can change people's thermal responses.[1]

Adaptive models of thermal comfort are implemented in other standards, such as European EN 15251 and ISO 7730 standard. While the exact derivation methods and results are slightly different from the ASHRAE 55 adaptive standard, they are substantially the same. A larger difference is in applicability. The ASHRAE adaptive standard only applies to buildings without mechanical cooling installed, while EN15251 can be applied to mixed-mode buildings, provided the system is not running.[53]

There are basically three categories of thermal adaptation, namely: behavioral, physiological, and psychological.

Psychological adaptation

[edit]

An individual's comfort level in a given environment may change and adapt over time due to psychological factors. Subjective perception of thermal comfort may be influenced by the memory of previous experiences. Habituation takes place when repeated exposure moderates future expectations, and responses to sensory input. This is an important factor in explaining the difference between field observations and PMV predictions (based on the static model) in naturally ventilated buildings. In these buildings, the relationship with the outdoor temperatures has been twice as strong as predicted.[3]

Psychological adaptation is subtly different in the static and adaptive models. Laboratory tests of the static model can identify and quantify non-heat transfer (psychological) factors that affect reported comfort. The adaptive model is limited to reporting differences (called psychological) between modeled and reported comfort.[citation needed]

Thermal comfort as a "condition of mind" is defined in psychological terms. Among the factors that affect the condition of mind (in the laboratory) are a sense of control over the temperature, knowledge of the temperature and the appearance of the (test) environment. A thermal test chamber that appeared residential "felt" warmer than one which looked like the inside of a refrigerator.[54]

Physiological adaptation

[edit]

The body has several thermal adjustment mechanisms to survive in drastic temperature environments. In a cold environment the body utilizes vasoconstriction; which reduces blood flow to the skin, skin temperature and heat dissipation. In a warm environment, vasodilation will increase blood flow to the skin, heat transport, and skin temperature and heat dissipation.[55] If there is an imbalance despite the vasomotor adjustments listed above, in a warm environment sweat production will start and provide evaporative cooling. If this is insufficient, hyperthermia will set in, body temperature may reach 40 °C (104 °F), and heat stroke may occur. In a cold environment, shivering will start, involuntarily forcing the muscles to work and increasing the heat production by up to a factor of 10. If equilibrium is not restored, hypothermia can set in, which can be fatal.[55] Long-term adjustments to extreme temperatures, of a few days to six months, may result in cardiovascular and endocrine adjustments. A hot climate may create increased blood volume, improving the effectiveness of vasodilation, enhanced performance of the sweat mechanism, and the readjustment of thermal preferences. In cold or underheated conditions, vasoconstriction can become permanent, resulting in decreased blood volume and increased body metabolic rate.[55]

Behavioral adaptation

[edit]

In naturally ventilated buildings, occupants take numerous actions to keep themselves comfortable when the indoor conditions drift towards discomfort. Operating windows and fans, adjusting blinds/shades, changing clothing, and consuming food and drinks are some of the common adaptive strategies. Among these, adjusting windows is the most common.[56] Those occupants who take these sorts of actions tend to feel cooler at warmer temperatures than those who do not.[57]

The behavioral actions significantly influence energy simulation inputs, and researchers are developing behavior models to improve the accuracy of simulation results. For example, there are many window-opening models that have been developed to date, but there is no consensus over the factors that trigger window opening.[56]

People might adapt to seasonal heat by becoming more nocturnal, doing physical activity and even conducting business at night.

Specificity and sensitivity

[edit]

Individual differences

[edit]

The thermal sensitivity of an individual is quantified by the descriptor FS, which takes on higher values for individuals with lower tolerance to non-ideal thermal conditions.[58] This group includes pregnant women, the disabled, as well as individuals whose age is below fourteen or above sixty, which is considered the adult range. Existing literature provides consistent evidence that sensitivity to hot and cold surfaces usually declines with age. There is also some evidence of a gradual reduction in the effectiveness of the body in thermo-regulation after the age of sixty.[58] This is mainly due to a more sluggish response of the counteraction mechanisms in lower parts of the body that are used to maintain the core temperature of the body at ideal values.[58] Seniors prefer warmer temperatures than young adults (76 vs 72 degrees F or 24.4 vs 22.2 Celsius).[54]

Situational factors include the health, psychological, sociological, and vocational activities of the persons.

Biological sex differences

[edit]

While thermal comfort preferences between sexes seem to be small, there are some average differences. Studies have found males on average report discomfort due to rises in temperature much earlier than females. Males on average also estimate higher levels of their sensation of discomfort than females. One recent study tested males and females in the same cotton clothing, performing mental jobs while using a dial vote to report their thermal comfort to the changing temperature.[59] Many times, females preferred higher temperatures than males. But while females tend to be more sensitive to temperatures, males tend to be more sensitive to relative-humidity levels.[60][61]

An extensive field study was carried out in naturally ventilated residential buildings in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. This investigation explored the sexes thermal sensitivity to the indoor environment in non-air-conditioned residential buildings. Multiple hierarchical regression for categorical moderator was selected for data analysis; the result showed that as a group females were slightly more sensitive than males to the indoor air temperatures, whereas, under thermal neutrality, it was found that males and females have similar thermal sensation.[62]

Regional differences

[edit]

In different areas of the world, thermal comfort needs may vary based on climate. In China[where?] the climate has hot humid summers and cold winters, causing a need for efficient thermal comfort. Energy conservation in relation to thermal comfort has become a large issue in China in the last several decades due to rapid economic and population growth.[63] Researchers are now looking into ways to heat and cool buildings in China for lower costs and also with less harm to the environment.

In tropical areas of Brazil, urbanization is creating urban heat islands (UHI). These are urban areas that have risen over the thermal comfort limits due to a large influx of people and only drop within the comfortable range during the rainy season.[64] Urban heat islands can occur over any urban city or built-up area with the correct conditions.[65][66]

In the hot, humid region of Saudi Arabia, the issue of thermal comfort has been important in mosques, because they are very large open buildings that are used only intermittently (very busy for the noon prayer on Fridays) it is hard to ventilate them properly. The large size requires a large amount of ventilation, which requires a lot of energy since the buildings are used only for short periods of time. Temperature regulation in mosques is a challenge due to the intermittent demand, leading to many mosques being either too hot or too cold. The stack effect also comes into play due to their large size and creates a large layer of hot air above the people in the mosque. New designs have placed the ventilation systems lower in the buildings to provide more temperature control at ground level.[67] New monitoring steps are also being taken to improve efficiency.[68]

Thermal stress

[edit]

The concept of thermal comfort is closely related to thermal stress. This attempts to predict the impact of solar radiation, air movement, and humidity for military personnel undergoing training exercises or athletes during competitive events. Several thermal stress indices have been proposed, such as the Predicted Heat Strain (PHS) or the humidex.[69] Generally, humans do not perform well under thermal stress. People's performances under thermal stress is about 11% lower than their performance at normal thermal wet conditions. Also, human performance in relation to thermal stress varies greatly by the type of task which the individual is completing. Some of the physiological effects of thermal heat stress include increased blood flow to the skin, sweating, and increased ventilation.[70][71]

Predicted Heat Strain (PHS)

[edit]

The PHS model, developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) committee, allows the analytical evaluation of the thermal stress experienced by a working subject in a hot environment.[72] It describes a method for predicting the sweat rate and the internal core temperature that the human body will develop in response to the working conditions. The PHS is calculated as a function of several physical parameters, consequently it makes it possible to determine which parameter or group of parameters should be modified, and to what extent, in order to reduce the risk of physiological strains. The PHS model does not predict the physiological response of an individual subject, but only considers standard subjects in good health and fit for the work they perform. The PHS can be determined using either the Python package pythermalcomfort[10] or the R package comf.

American Conference on Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) Action Limits and Threshold Limit Values

[edit]

ACGIH has established Action Limits and Threshold Limit Values for heat stress based upon the estimated metabolic rate of a worker and the environmental conditions the worker is subjected to.

This methodology has been adopted by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) as an effective method of assesing heat stress within workplaces.[73]

Research

[edit]

The factors affecting thermal comfort were explored experimentally in the 1970s. Many of these studies led to the development and refinement of ASHRAE Standard 55 and were performed at Kansas State University by Ole Fanger and others. Perceived comfort was found to be a complex interaction of these variables. It was found that the majority of individuals would be satisfied by an ideal set of values. As the range of values deviated progressively from the ideal, fewer and fewer people were satisfied. This observation could be expressed statistically as the percent of individuals who expressed satisfaction by comfort conditions and the predicted mean vote (PMV). This approach was challenged by the adaptive comfort model, developed from the ASHRAE 884 project, which revealed that occupants were comfortable in a broader range of temperatures.[3]

This research is applied to create Building Energy Simulation (BES) programs for residential buildings. Residential buildings in particular can vary much more in thermal comfort than public and commercial buildings. This is due to their smaller size, the variations in clothing worn, and different uses of each room. The main rooms of concern are bathrooms and bedrooms. Bathrooms need to be at a temperature comfortable for a human with or without clothing. Bedrooms are of importance because they need to accommodate different levels of clothing and also different metabolic rates of people asleep or awake.[74] Discomfort hours is a common metric used to evaluate the thermal performance of a space.

Thermal comfort research in clothing is currently being done by the military. New air-ventilated garments are being researched to improve evaporative cooling in military settings. Some models are being created and tested based on the amount of cooling they provide.[75]

In the last twenty years, researchers have also developed advanced thermal comfort models that divide the human body into many segments, and predict local thermal discomfort by considering heat balance.[76][77][78] This has opened up a new arena of thermal comfort modeling that aims at heating/cooling selected body parts.

Another area of study is the hue-heat hypothesis that states that an environment with warm colors (red, orange yellow hues) will feel warmer in terms of temperature and comfort, while an environment with cold colors (blue, green hues) will feel cooler.[79][80][81] The hue-heat hypothesis has both been investigated scientifically[82] and ingrained in popular culture in the terms warm and cold colors [83]

Medical environments

[edit]

Whenever the studies referenced tried to discuss the thermal conditions for different groups of occupants in one room, the studies ended up simply presenting comparisons of thermal comfort satisfaction based on the subjective studies. No study tried to reconcile the different thermal comfort requirements of different types of occupants who compulsorily must stay in one room. Therefore, it looks to be necessary to investigate the different thermal conditions required by different groups of occupants in hospitals to reconcile their different requirements in this concept. To reconcile the differences in the required thermal comfort conditions it is recommended to test the possibility of using different ranges of local radiant temperature in one room via a suitable mechanical system.

Although different researches are undertaken on thermal comfort for patients in hospitals, it is also necessary to study the effects of thermal comfort conditions on the quality and the quantity of healing for patients in hospitals. There are also original researches that show the link between thermal comfort for staff and their levels of productivity, but no studies have been produced individually in hospitals in this field. Therefore, research for coverage and methods individually for this subject is recommended. Also research in terms of cooling and heating delivery systems for patients with low levels of immune-system protection (such as HIV patients, burned patients, etc.) are recommended. There are important areas, which still need to be focused on including thermal comfort for staff and its relation with their productivity, using different heating systems to prevent hypothermia in the patient and to improve the thermal comfort for hospital staff simultaneously.

Finally, the interaction between people, systems and architectural design in hospitals is a field in which require further work needed to improve the knowledge of how to design buildings and systems to reconcile many conflicting factors for the people occupying these buildings.[84]

Personal comfort systems

[edit]

Personal comfort systems (PCS) refer to devices or systems which heat or cool a building occupant personally.[85] This concept is best appreciated in contrast to central HVAC systems which have uniform temperature settings for extensive areas. Personal comfort systems include fans and air diffusers of various kinds (e.g. desk fans, nozzles and slot diffusers, overhead fans, high-volume low-speed fans etc.) and personalized sources of radiant or conductive heat (footwarmers, legwarmers, hot water bottles etc.). PCS has the potential to satisfy individual comfort requirements much better than current HVAC systems, as interpersonal differences in thermal sensation due to age, sex, body mass, metabolic rate, clothing and thermal adaptation can amount to an equivalent temperature variation of 2–5 °C (3,6–9 °F), which is impossible for a central, uniform HVAC system to cater to.[85] Besides, research has shown that the perceived ability to control one's thermal environment tends to widen one's range of tolerable temperatures.[3] Traditionally, PCS devices have been used in isolation from one another. However, it has been proposed by Andersen et al. (2016) that a network of PCS devices which generate well-connected microzones of thermal comfort, and report real-time occupant information and respond to programmatic actuation requests (e.g. a party, a conference, a concert etc.) can combine with occupant-aware building applications to enable new methods of comfort maximization.[86]

See also

[edit]
  • ASHRAE
  • ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55
  • Air conditioning
  • Building insulation
  • Cold and heat adaptations in humans
  • Heat stress
  • Mean radiant temperature
  • Mahoney tables
  • Povl Ole Fanger
  • Psychrometrics
  • Ralph G. Nevins
  • Room air distribution
  • Room temperature
  • Ventilative cooling

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2017, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy
  2. ^ Çengel, Yunus A.; Boles, Michael A. (2015). Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN 978-0-07-339817-4.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i de Dear, Richard; Brager, Gail (1998). "Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference". ASHRAE Transactions. 104 (1): 145–67.
  4. ^ Battistel, Laura; Vilardi, Andrea; Zampini, Massimiliano; Parin, Riccardo (2023). "An investigation on humans' sensitivity to environmental temperature". Scientific Reports. 13 (1). doi:10.1038/s41598-023-47880-5. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 10695924. PMID 38049468.
  5. ^ a b c Fanger, P Ole (1970). Thermal Comfort: Analysis and applications in environmental engineering. Danish Technical Press. ISBN 8757103410.[page needed]
  6. ^ Nicol, Fergus; Humphreys, Michael (2002). "Adaptive thermal comfort and sustainable thermal standards for buildings" (PDF). Energy and Buildings. 34 (6): 563–572. doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00006-3. S2CID 17571584.[permanent dead link]
  7. ^ ISO, 2005. ISO 7730 - Ergonomics of the thermal environment — Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria.
  8. ^ CEN, 2019. EN 16798-1 - Energy performance of buildings - Ventilation for buildings. Part 1: Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics.
  9. ^ a b c Tartarini, Federico; Schiavon, Stefano; Cheung, Toby; Hoyt, Tyler (2020). "CBE Thermal Comfort Tool: Online tool for thermal comfort calculations and visualizations". SoftwareX. 12: 100563. Bibcode:2020SoftX..1200563T. doi:10.1016/j.softx.2020.100563. S2CID 225631918.
  10. ^ a b c Tartarini, Federico; Schiavon, Stefano (2020-07-01). "pythermalcomfort: A Python package for thermal comfort research". SoftwareX. 12: 100578. Bibcode:2020SoftX..1200578T. doi:10.1016/j.softx.2020.100578. ISSN 2352-7110. S2CID 225618628.
  11. ^ Axelrod, Yekaterina K.; Diringer, Michael N. (2008). "Temperature Management in Acute Neurologic Disorders". Neurologic Clinics. 26 (2): 585–603. doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2008.02.005. ISSN 0733-8619. PMID 18514828.
  12. ^ Laupland, Kevin B. (2009). "Fever in the critically ill medical patient". Critical Care Medicine. 37 (Supplement): S273–S278. doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181aa6117. ISSN 0090-3493. PMID 19535958. S2CID 21002774.
  13. ^ Brown, Douglas J.A.; Brugger, Hermann; Boyd, Jeff; Paal, Peter (2012-11-15). "Accidental Hypothermia". New England Journal of Medicine. 367 (20): 1930–1938. doi:10.1056/nejmra1114208. ISSN 0028-4793. PMID 23150960. S2CID 205116341.
  14. ^ Vitruvius, Marcus (2001). The Ten Books of Architecture. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-71733-6.
  15. ^ Linden, David J. (1961). Touch: the science of hand, heart, and mind. New York. ISBN 9780670014873. OCLC 881888093.cite book: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  16. ^ Lisa., Heschong (1979). Thermal delight in architecture. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. ISBN 978-0262081016. OCLC 5353303.
  17. ^ Wargocki, Pawel, and Olli A. Seppänen, et al. (2006) "Indoor Climate and Productivity in Offices". Vol. 6. REHVA Guidebooks 6. Brussels, Belgium: REHVA, Federation of European Heating and Air-conditioning Associations.
  18. ^ Wyon, D.P.; Andersen, I.; Lundqvist, G.R. (1981), "Effects of Moderate Heat Stress on Mental Performance", Studies in Environmental Science, vol. 5, no. 4, Elsevier, pp. 251–267, doi:10.1016/s0166-1116(08)71093-8, ISBN 9780444997616, PMID 538426
  19. ^ Fang, L; Wyon, DP; Clausen, G; Fanger, PO (2004). "Impact of indoor air temperature and humidity in an office on perceived air quality, SBS symptoms and performance". Indoor Air. 14 (Suppl 7): 74–81. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00276.x. PMID 15330775.
  20. ^ Cabanac, Michel (1971). "Physiological role of pleasure". Science. 173 (4002): 1103–7. Bibcode:1971Sci...173.1103C. doi:10.1126/science.173.4002.1103. PMID 5098954. S2CID 38234571.
  21. ^ Parkinson, Thomas; de Dear, Richard (2014-12-15). "Thermal pleasure in built environments: physiology of alliesthesia". Building Research & Information. 43 (3): 288–301. doi:10.1080/09613218.2015.989662. ISSN 0961-3218. S2CID 109419103.
  22. ^ Hitchings, Russell; Shu Jun Lee (2008). "Air Conditioning and the Material Culture of Routine Human Encasement". Journal of Material Culture. 13 (3): 251–265. doi:10.1177/1359183508095495. ISSN 1359-1835. S2CID 144084245.
  23. ^ Toftum, J. (2005). "Thermal Comfort Indices". Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods. Boca Raton, FL, USA: 63.CRC Press.[page needed]
  24. ^ Smolander, J. (2002). "Effect of Cold Exposure on Older Humans". International Journal of Sports Medicine. 23 (2): 86–92. doi:10.1055/s-2002-20137. PMID 11842354. S2CID 26072420.
  25. ^ Khodakarami, J. (2009). Achieving thermal comfort. VDM Verlag. ISBN 978-3-639-18292-7.[page needed]
  26. ^ Thermal Comfort chapter, Fundamentals volume of the ASHRAE Handbook, ASHRAE, Inc., Atlanta, GA, 2005[page needed]
  27. ^ Ainsworth, BE; Haskell, WL; Whitt, MC; Irwin, ML; Swartz, AM; Strath, SJ; O'Brien, WL; Bassett Jr, DR; Schmitz, KH; Emplaincourt, PO; Jacobs Jr, DR; Leon, AS (2000). "Compendium of physical activities: An update of activity codes and MET intensities". Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 32 (9 Suppl): S498–504. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.524.3133. doi:10.1097/00005768-200009001-00009. PMID 10993420.
  28. ^ a b Szokolay, Steven V. (2010). Introduction to Architectural Science: The Basis of Sustainable Design (2nd ed.). pp. 16–22.
  29. ^ Havenith, G (1999). "Heat balance when wearing protective clothing". The Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 43 (5): 289–96. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.566.3967. doi:10.1016/S0003-4878(99)00051-4. PMID 10481628.
  30. ^ McCullough, Elizabeth A.; Eckels, Steve; Harms, Craig (2009). "Determining temperature ratings for children's cold weather clothing". Applied Ergonomics. 40 (5): 870–7. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2008.12.004. PMID 19272588.
  31. ^ Frank C. Mooren, ed. (2012). "Skin Wettedness". Encyclopedia of Exercise Medicine in Health and Disease. p. 790. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-29807-6_3041. ISBN 978-3-540-36065-0.
  32. ^ Fukazawa, Takako; Havenith, George (2009). "Differences in comfort perception in relation to local and whole-body skin wetness". European Journal of Applied Physiology. 106 (1): 15–24. doi:10.1007/s00421-009-0983-z. PMID 19159949. S2CID 9932558.
  33. ^ a b ANSI, ASHRAE, 2020. Standard - 55 Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy.
  34. ^ Balaras, Constantinos A.; Dascalaki, Elena; Gaglia, Athina (2007). "HVAC and indoor thermal conditions in hospital operating rooms". Energy and Buildings. 39 (4): 454. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.09.004.
  35. ^ Wolkoff, Peder; Kjaergaard, Søren K. (2007). "The dichotomy of relative humidity on indoor air quality". Environment International. 33 (6): 850–7. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2007.04.004. PMID 17499853.
  36. ^ Hashiguchi, Nobuko; Tochihara, Yutaka (2009). "Effects of low humidity and high air velocity in a heated room on physiological responses and thermal comfort after bathing: An experimental study". International Journal of Nursing Studies. 46 (2): 172–80. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.09.014. PMID 19004439.
  37. ^ McMullan, Randall (2012). Environmental Science in Building. Macmillan International Higher Education. p. 25. ISBN 9780230390355.[permanent dead link]
  38. ^ "Humidity". Humidity. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia (6th ed.). Columbia University Press. 2012.
  39. ^ "How the weather makes you hot and cold". Popular Mechanics. Hearst Magazines. July 1935. p. 36.
  40. ^ Morris, Nathan B.; English, Timothy; Hospers, Lily; Capon, Anthony; Jay, Ollie (2019-08-06). "The Effects of Electric Fan Use Under Differing Resting Heat Index Conditions: A Clinical Trial". Annals of Internal Medicine. 171 (9). American College of Physicians: 675–677. doi:10.7326/m19-0512. ISSN 0003-4819. PMID 31382270. S2CID 199447588.
  41. ^ "Radiation and Thermal Comfort for Indoor Spaces | SimScale Blog". SimScale. 2019-06-27. Retrieved 2019-10-14.
  42. ^ Humphreys, Michael A.; Nicol, J. Fergus; Raja, Iftikhar A. (2007). "Field Studies of Indoor Thermal Comfort and the Progress of the Adaptive Approach". Advances in Building Energy Research. 1 (1): 55–88. doi:10.1080/17512549.2007.9687269. ISSN 1751-2549. S2CID 109030483.
  43. ^ Brager, Gail S.; de Dear, Richard J. (1998). "Thermal adaptation in the built environment: a literature review". Energy and Buildings. 27 (1): 83–96. doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(97)00053-4. ISSN 0378-7788. S2CID 114893272.
  44. ^ Hoyt, Tyler; Schiavon, Stefano; Piccioli, Alberto; Moon, Dustin; Steinfeld, Kyle (2013). "CBE Thermal Comfort Tool". Center for the Built Environment, University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved 21 November 2013.
  45. ^ a b Cheung, Toby; Schiavon, Stefano; Parkinson, Thomas; Li, Peixian; Brager, Gail (2019-04-15). "Analysis of the accuracy on PMV – PPD model using the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II". Building and Environment. 153: 205–217. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.01.055. ISSN 0360-1323. S2CID 115526743.
  46. ^ Földváry Ličina, Veronika; Cheung, Toby; Zhang, Hui; de Dear, Richard; Parkinson, Thomas; Arens, Edward; Chun, Chungyoon; Schiavon, Stefano; Luo, Maohui (2018-09-01). "Development of the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II". Building and Environment. 142: 502–512. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.06.022. hdl:11311/1063927. ISSN 0360-1323. S2CID 115289014.
  47. ^ WC16 Saberi (PDF). p. 1329 (p. 5 in the PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 June 2016. Retrieved 31 May 2017.
  48. ^ a b c Gagge, AP; Fobelets, AP; Berglund, LG (1986). "A standard predictive index of human response to the thermal environment". ASHRAE Transactions. 92 (2nd ed.): 709–31.
  49. ^ a b Doherty, TJ; Arens, E.A. (1988). "Evaluation of the physiological bases of thermal comfort models". ASHRAE Transactions. 94 (1): 15.
  50. ^ Berglund, Larry (1978). "Mathematical models for predicting the thermal comfort response of building occupants". ASHRAE Transactions. 84.
  51. ^ Fountain, Mark; Huizenga, Charlie (1997). "A thermal sensation prediction software tool for use by the profession". ASHRAE Transactions. 103 (2).
  52. ^ La Roche, P. (2011). Carbon-neutral architectural design. CRC Press.[page needed]
  53. ^ EN 15251 Standard 2007, Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics
  54. ^ a b Rohles, Frederick H. (February 2007). "Temperature & Temperament - A Psychologist Looks at Comfort". ASHRAE Journal: 14–22.
  55. ^ a b c Szokolay, Steven V. (2010). Introduction to Architectural Science: The Basis of Sustainable Design (2nd ed.). p. 19.
  56. ^ a b Nicol, J Fergus (2001). "Characterising Occupant Behaviour in Buildings" (PDF). Proceedings of the Seventh International IBPSA Conference. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. pp. 1073–1078.
  57. ^ Haldi, Frédéric; Robinson, Darren (2008). "On the behaviour and adaptation of office occupants". Building and Environment. 43 (12): 2163. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.01.003.
  58. ^ a b c Lenzuni, P.; Freda, D.; Del Gaudio, M. (2009). "Classification of Thermal Environments for Comfort Assessment". Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 53 (4): 325–32. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mep012. PMID 19299555.
  59. ^ Wyon, D.P.; Andersen, I.; Lundqvist, G.R. (2009). "Spontaneous magnitude estimation of thermal discomfort during changes in the ambient temperature*". Journal of Hygiene. 70 (2): 203–21. doi:10.1017/S0022172400022269. PMC 2130040. PMID 4503865.
  60. ^ Karjalainen, Sami (2007). "Biological sex differences in thermal comfort and use of thermostats in everyday thermal environments". Building and Environment. 42 (4): 1594–1603. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.01.009.
  61. ^ Lan, Li; Lian, Zhiwei; Liu, Weiwei; Liu, Yuanmou (2007). "Investigation of biological sex difference in thermal comfort for Chinese people". European Journal of Applied Physiology. 102 (4): 471–80. doi:10.1007/s00421-007-0609-2. PMID 17994246. S2CID 26541128.
  62. ^ Harimi Djamila; Chi Chu Ming; Sivakumar Kumaresan (6–7 November 2012), "Assessment of Gender Differences in Their Thermal Sensations to the Indoor Thermal Environment", Engineering Goes Green, 7th CUTSE Conference, Sarawak Malaysia: School of Engineering & Science, Curtin University, pp. 262–266, ISBN 978-983-44482-3-3.
  63. ^ Yu, Jinghua; Yang, Changzhi; Tian, Liwei; Liao, Dan (2009). "Evaluation on energy and thermal performance for residential envelopes in hot summer and cold winter zone of China". Applied Energy. 86 (10): 1970. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.01.012.
  64. ^ Silva, Vicente de Paulo Rodrigues; De Azevedo, Pedro Vieira; Brito, Robson Souto; Campos, João Hugo Baracuy (2009). "Evaluating the urban climate of a typically tropical city of northeastern Brazil". Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 161 (1–4): 45–59. doi:10.1007/s10661-008-0726-3. PMID 19184489. S2CID 23126235..
  65. ^ United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air and Radiation. Office of the Administrator.; Smart Growth Network (2003). Smart Growth and Urban Heat Islands. (EPA-content)
  66. ^ Shmaefsky, Brian R. (2006). "One Hot Demonstration: The Urban Heat Island Effect" (PDF). Journal of College Science Teaching. 35 (7): 52–54. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-03-16.
  67. ^ Al-Homoud, Mohammad S.; Abdou, Adel A.; Budaiwi, Ismail M. (2009). "Assessment of monitored energy use and thermal comfort conditions in mosques in hot-humid climates". Energy and Buildings. 41 (6): 607. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.12.005.
  68. ^ Nasrollahi, N. (2009). Thermal environments and occupant thermal comfort. VDM Verlag, 2009, ISBN 978-3-639-16978-2.[page needed]
  69. ^ "About the WBGT and Apparent Temperature Indices".
  70. ^ Hancock, P. A.; Ross, Jennifer M.; Szalma, James L. (2007). "A Meta-Analysis of Performance Response Under Thermal Stressors". Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 49 (5): 851–77. doi:10.1518/001872007X230226. PMID 17915603. S2CID 17379285.
  71. ^ Leon, Lisa R. (2008). "Thermoregulatory responses to environmental toxicants: The interaction of thermal stress and toxicant exposure". Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 233 (1): 146–61. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2008.01.012. PMID 18313713.
  72. ^ ISO, 2004. ISO 7933 - Ergonomics of the thermal environment — Analytical determination and interpretation of heat stress using calculation of the predicted heat strain.
  73. ^ "OSHA Technical Manual (OTM) Section III: Chapter 4". osha.gov. September 15, 2017. Retrieved January 11, 2024.
  74. ^ Peeters, Leen; Dear, Richard de; Hensen, Jan; d’Haeseleer, William (2009). "Thermal comfort in residential buildings: Comfort values and scales for building energy simulation". Applied Energy. 86 (5): 772. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.07.011.
  75. ^ Barwood, Martin J.; Newton, Phillip S.; Tipton, Michael J. (2009). "Ventilated Vest and Tolerance for Intermittent Exercise in Hot, Dry Conditions with Military Clothing". Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. 80 (4): 353–9. doi:10.3357/ASEM.2411.2009. PMID 19378904.
  76. ^ Zhang, Hui; Arens, Edward; Huizenga, Charlie; Han, Taeyoung (2010). "Thermal sensation and comfort models for non-uniform and transient environments: Part I: Local sensation of individual body parts". Building and Environment. 45 (2): 380. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.06.018. S2CID 220973362.
  77. ^ Zhang, Hui; Arens, Edward; Huizenga, Charlie; Han, Taeyoung (2010). "Thermal sensation and comfort models for non-uniform and transient environments, part II: Local comfort of individual body parts". Building and Environment. 45 (2): 389. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.06.015.
  78. ^ Zhang, Hui; Arens, Edward; Huizenga, Charlie; Han, Taeyoung (2010). "Thermal sensation and comfort models for non-uniform and transient environments, part III: Whole-body sensation and comfort". Building and Environment. 45 (2): 399. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.06.020.
  79. ^ Tsushima, Yoshiaki; Okada, Sho; Kawai, Yuka; Sumita, Akio; Ando, Hiroshi; Miki, Mitsunori (10 August 2020). "Effect of illumination on perceived temperature". PLOS ONE. 15 (8): e0236321. Bibcode:2020PLoSO..1536321T. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236321. PMC 7416916. PMID 32776987.
  80. ^ Ziat, Mounia; Balcer, Carrie Anne; Shirtz, Andrew; Rolison, Taylor (2016). "A Century Later, the Hue-Heat Hypothesis: Does Color Truly Affect Temperature Perception?". Haptics: Perception, Devices, Control, and Applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 9774. pp. 273–280. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42321-0_25. ISBN 978-3-319-42320-3.
  81. ^ "Hue Heat". Medium. 10 April 2022. Retrieved 15 May 2023.
  82. ^ Toftum, Jørn; Thorseth, Anders; Markvart, Jakob; Logadóttir, Ásta (October 2018). "Occupant response to different correlated colour temperatures of white LED lighting" (PDF). Building and Environment. 143: 258–268. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.07.013. S2CID 115803800.
  83. ^ "Temperature - Colour - National 5 Art and Design Revision". BBC Bitesize. Retrieved 15 May 2023.
  84. ^ Khodakarami, Jamal; Nasrollahi, Nazanin (2012). "Thermal comfort in hospitals – A literature review". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 16 (6): 4071. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.054.
  85. ^ a b Zhang, H.; Arens, E.; Zhai, Y. (2015). "A review of the corrective power of personal comfort systems in non-neutral ambient environments". Building and Environment. 91: 15–41. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.03.013.
  86. ^ Andersen, M.; Fiero, G.; Kumar, S. (21–26 August 2016). "Well-Connected Microzones for Increased Building Efficiency and Occupant Comfort". Proceedings of ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Thermal Comfort, Fanger, P. O, Danish Technical Press, 1970 (Republished by McGraw-Hill, New York, 1973).
  • Thermal Comfort chapter, Fundamentals volume of the ASHRAE Handbook, ASHRAE, Inc., Atlanta, GA, 2005.
  • Weiss, Hal (1998). Secrets of Warmth: For Comfort or Survival. Seattle, WA: Mountaineers Books. ISBN 978-0-89886-643-8. OCLC 40999076.
  • Godish, T. Indoor Environmental Quality. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2001.
  • Bessoudo, M. Building Facades and Thermal Comfort: The impacts of climate, solar shading, and glazing on the indoor thermal environment. VDM Verlag, 2008
  • Nicol, Fergus (2012). Adaptive thermal comfort : principles and practice. London New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0415691598.
  • Humphreys, Michael (2016). Adaptive thermal comfort : foundations and analysis. Abingdon, U.K. New York, NY: Routledge. ISBN 978-0415691611.
  • Communications in development and assembly of textile products, Open Access Journal, ISSN 2701-939X
  • Heat Stress, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
  • Cold Stress, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

 

Photo
Photo
Photo

Driving Directions in Tulsa County


Driving Directions From East Central High School to Durham Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Nights Stay Hotel to Durham Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Country Inn & Suites by Radisson, Tulsa, OK to Durham Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Blue Whale of Catoosa to Durham Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Tulsa Botanic Garden to Durham Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Golden Driller Statue to Durham Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Streetwalker Tours to Durham Supply Inc
Driving Directions From The Blue Dome to Durham Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Guthrie Green to Durham Supply Inc

Reviews for Durham Supply Inc


Durham Supply Inc

Ty Spears

(5)

Bought a door/storm door combo. Turns out it was the wrong size. They swapped it out, quick and easy no problems. Very helpful in explaining the size differences from standard door sizes.

Durham Supply Inc

Gerald Clifford Brewster

(5)

We will see, the storm door I bought says on the tag it's 36x80, but it's 34x80. If they return it.......they had no problems returning it. And it was no fault of there's, you measure a mobile home door different than a standard door!

Durham Supply Inc

B Mann

(5)

I was in need of some items for a double wide that I am remodeling and this place is the only place in town that had what I needed ( I didn't even try the other rude place )while I was there I learned the other place that was in Tulsa that also sold mobile home supplies went out of business (no wonder the last time I was in there they were VERY RUDE and high priced) I like the way Dunham does business they answered all my questions and got me the supplies I needed, very friendly, I will be back to purchase the rest of my items when the time comes.

View GBP

Frequently Asked Questions

Start by cleaning or replacing air filters to improve airflow. Check and clean the outdoor unit, clear debris around it, and inspect ductwork for leaks. Schedule a professional maintenance check to ensure all components are operating efficiently.
For energy efficiency without sacrificing comfort, set your thermostat to 78°F (25°C) when you’re at home. Consider using programmable thermostats to adjust temperatures automatically when youre away or asleep.
To optimize airflow, keep interior doors open to promote circulation, use ceiling fans to complement the HVAC system, and avoid blocking vents with furniture or curtains. Ensure windows are properly sealed to prevent cool air from escaping.
Use energy-efficient window coverings like blinds or shades during peak sun hours. Seal any gaps around windows and doors with weatherstripping. Consider adding insulation if needed and use appliances that generate less heat during cooler parts of the day.